{"attribution":{"source":"MIT AI Risk Repository, Domain Taxonomy of AI Risks v1 (MIT AI Risk Initiative)","license":"CC BY 4.0","license_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","citation":"Slattery, P., Saeri, A. K., Grundy, E. A. C., Graham, J., Noetel, M., Uuk, R., Dao, J., Pour, S., Casper, S., & Thompson, N. (2025). The AI Risk Repository: A comprehensive meta-review, database, and taxonomy of risks from artificial intelligence. arXiv:2408.12622."},"exported_at":"2026-11-12"}
{"rows":[{"ev_id":"70.02.02","slug":"misinformation-perlo","quick_ref":"Perlo2025","paper_title":"Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action","level":"Risk Sub-Category","risk_category":"Informational Risks ","risk_subcategory":"Misinformation","description":"\"Non-embodied AIs are known to propagate misinformation [81, 82]. Various studies have shown that LLMs hallucinate information, including academic citations [83], clinical knowledge [84], and cultural references [85]. EAI systems inherit these shortcomings in the physical world, answering user questions with deceptive or incorrect information [86]. Because VLAs fuse vision and language, their hallucinatory failures can be spatially grounded—e.g., misidentifying an object in view and then generating a plausible yet unsafe action plan around it. And although automated home assistants like Amazon","entity":"AI","intent":"Unintentional","timing":"Post-deployment","domain":3,"subdomain":"3.1","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/ai-risk/risks/misinformation-perlo"}]}