{"data":{"slug":"adverse-decision-explanation-and-appeal-kit","title":"AI Decision Explanation and Appeal Kit","type":"kit","formats":["docx","xlsx"],"topics":["transparency","oversight"],"frameworks":["eu-ai-act","colorado-ai-act"],"short":"When AI makes or supports a decision about a person: an adverse decision notice, an explanation reply, a human review procedure and a request log that counts days to answer, with every duty on record that asks for them.","covers":{"categories":["transparency","human_oversight"]},"version":1,"dataset_version":"c6967b988bb5","generated_at":"2026-10-05T15:51:16+00:00","citations":22,"downloads":0,"files":[{"format":"docx","filename":"adverse-decision-explanation-and-appeal-kit-v1.docx","bytes":13783,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/templates/adverse-decision-explanation-and-appeal-kit#download"},{"format":"xlsx","filename":"adverse-decision-explanation-and-appeal-kit-v1.xlsx","bytes":23555,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/templates/adverse-decision-explanation-and-appeal-kit#download"}],"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/templates/adverse-decision-explanation-and-appeal-kit","inside":["Notice and explanation letter templates","Human review procedure","Request log with days-taken formula","Explanation and appeal duties across every jurisdiction on record"],"legal_basis":["eu-ai-act","us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act"],"caveat":null,"covered_obligations":[{"slug":"australia-vaiss-testing-human-control-transparency","title":"Test and monitor systems, enable human control, and be transparent with users (guardrails 4 to 6)","policy":"australia-voluntary-ai-safety-standard","source_reference":"Guardrails 4, 5 and 6","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/australia-vaiss-testing-human-control-transparency"},{"slug":"us-california-sb-53-transparency-report","title":"Frontier developers must publish a transparency report before deploying a new frontier model","policy":"us-california-sb-53","source_reference":"Business and Professions Code Section 22757.12 (as added by SB 53)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-sb-53-transparency-report"},{"slug":"us-colorado-admt-advance-notice","title":"Notify consumers before automated decision-making technology influences a consequential decision","policy":"us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act","source_reference":null,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-advance-notice"},{"slug":"us-colorado-admt-adverse-decision-disclosure","title":"Disclose the use of the technology and the principal reasons after an adverse consequential decision","policy":"us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act","source_reference":null,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-adverse-decision-disclosure"},{"slug":"us-colorado-admt-human-review","title":"Offer meaningful human review of an adverse consequential decision","policy":"us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act","source_reference":null,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-human-review"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-transparency-to-deployers","title":"Provide deployers with clear instructions for use","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 13","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-transparency-to-deployers"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-human-oversight","title":"Enable and assign effective human oversight","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 14; Article 26(2) for deployers","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-human-oversight"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-transparency-article-50","title":"Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 50","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-transparency-article-50"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-26-7-worker-information","title":"Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 26(7)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-26-7-worker-information"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-26-11-notice-to-affected-persons","title":"Deployers must tell natural persons that a high-risk AI system is used in decisions about them","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 26(11)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-26-11-notice-to-affected-persons"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-50-2-synthetic-content-marking","title":"Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic output as artificially generated in a machine-readable way","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 50(2)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-50-2-synthetic-content-marking"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-50-3-emotion-recognition-notice","title":"Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must inform exposed persons","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 50(3)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-50-3-emotion-recognition-notice"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-50-4-deepfake-and-public-interest-text-disclosure","title":"Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 50(4)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-50-4-deepfake-and-public-interest-text-disclosure"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-86-right-to-explanation","title":"Deployers must explain individual decisions taken with high-risk AI on request","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 86","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-86-right-to-explanation"},{"slug":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-publish-audit-summary","title":"Employers and employment agencies must publish a summary of the bias audit results","policy":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-automated-employment-decision-tools","source_reference":"NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(a)(2); 6 RCNY Section 5-302","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-city-local-law-144-publish-audit-summary"},{"slug":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-candidate-notice","title":"Employers and employment agencies must notify candidates and employees before an automated tool is used","policy":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-automated-employment-decision-tools","source_reference":"NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(1) and (b)(2); 6 RCNY Section 5-303","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-city-local-law-144-candidate-notice"},{"slug":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-alternative-process-request","title":"Employers and employment agencies must let candidates request an alternative selection process or accommodation","policy":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-automated-employment-decision-tools","source_reference":"NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(1); 6 RCNY Section 5-303","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-city-local-law-144-alternative-process-request"},{"slug":"singapore-mgf-human-involvement","title":"Determine the appropriate level of human involvement in AI decisions","policy":"singapore-model-ai-governance-framework","source_reference":"Second edition, Part on human involvement in AI-augmented decision-making","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/singapore-mgf-human-involvement"},{"slug":"singapore-mgf-genai-incident-reporting-and-provenance","title":"Report incidents and mark AI-generated content (generative AI framework)","policy":"singapore-model-ai-governance-framework","source_reference":"Generative AI framework, dimensions on incident reporting and content provenance","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/singapore-mgf-genai-incident-reporting-and-provenance"},{"slug":"singapore-pdpc-ai-notification","title":"Notify individuals about the use of personal data in AI recommendations and decisions","policy":"singapore-pdpc-ai-advisory-guidelines","source_reference":"Advisory guidelines, section on notification obligation","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/singapore-pdpc-ai-notification"},{"slug":"south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-advance-notice-of-high-impact-and-generative-ai","title":"AI business operators must notify users in advance that a product or service runs on high-impact or generative AI","policy":"south-korea-framework-act-on-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-and-establishment-of-a-foundation-for","source_reference":"Article 31(1)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-advance-notice-of-high-impact-and-generative-ai"},{"slug":"south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-generative-output-labelling-and-deepfake-notice","title":"AI business operators must label generative AI output and clearly flag realistic synthetic media","policy":"south-korea-framework-act-on-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-and-establishment-of-a-foundation-for","source_reference":"Article 31(2) and 31(3)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-generative-output-labelling-and-deepfake-notice"},{"slug":"south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-34-high-impact-ai-explanation-measures","title":"Operators of high-impact AI must be able to explain outputs and the main criteria behind them","policy":"south-korea-framework-act-on-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-and-establishment-of-a-foundation-for","source_reference":"Article 34(1)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-34-high-impact-ai-explanation-measures"},{"slug":"south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-34-high-impact-ai-human-oversight","title":"Operators of high-impact AI must ensure human management and supervision","policy":"south-korea-framework-act-on-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-and-establishment-of-a-foundation-for","source_reference":"Article 34(1)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-34-high-impact-ai-human-oversight"},{"slug":"us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga-government-agency-ai-interaction-disclosure","title":"Government agencies must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system","policy":"us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga","source_reference":"Business and Commerce Code Section 551.051","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga-government-agency-ai-interaction-disclosure"},{"slug":"us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga-health-care-ai-disclosure","title":"Health-care providers must disclose the use of AI in patient services","policy":"us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga","source_reference":"Business and Commerce Code Section 551.051","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga-health-care-ai-disclosure"},{"slug":"uae-pdpl-automated-decision-objection","title":"Respect the right to object to automated decision-making without human intervention","policy":"uae-personal-data-protection-law","source_reference":"Article on data-subject rights relating to automated processing (reviewer to cite article number)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/uae-pdpl-automated-decision-objection"},{"slug":"uk-principles-transparency-explainability","title":"Provide appropriate transparency and explainability","policy":"uk-ai-regulation-white-paper","source_reference":"Principle 2, Part 3","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/uk-principles-transparency-explainability"},{"slug":"uk-principles-contestability-redress","title":"Provide routes to contest AI outcomes and seek redress","policy":"uk-ai-regulation-white-paper","source_reference":"Principle 5, Part 3","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/uk-principles-contestability-redress"},{"slug":"uk-ico-automated-decision-safeguards","title":"Apply safeguards to solely automated decisions with significant effects","policy":"uk-ico-ai-data-protection-guidance","source_reference":"UK GDPR Article 22 as amended by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/uk-ico-automated-decision-safeguards"},{"slug":"us-omb-m-25-21-use-case-inventory","title":"Publish an annual AI use-case inventory","policy":"us-omb-m-25-21","source_reference":"Section 3","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-omb-m-25-21-use-case-inventory"}],"versions":[{"version":1,"generated_at":"2026-10-05T15:51:16+00:00","dataset_version":"c6967b988bb5","changelog":"First version, built from dataset c6967b988bb5.","stats":{"sheets":{"Requests log":0,"Explanation and appeal duties":11},"blocks":73,"headings":16,"citations":22}}]},"meta":{"license":"CC BY 4.0","license_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","disclaimer":"This template is generated from the records on aipolicytracker.org. It is an informational resource, not legal advice, and completing it does not make an organisation compliant with any law or standard. Every row that cites a duty links to the record it came from; check the official source before relying on it."}}