{"data":{"slug":"ai-model-card","title":"AI Model Card","type":"kit","formats":["docx","xlsx"],"topics":["transparency","evidence"],"frameworks":["eu-ai-act","iso-42001","nist-ai-rmf"],"short":"A model or system card: intended use, out-of-scope uses, data, evaluation results by group, risks, oversight and monitoring, with the documentation and transparency duties it helps evidence.","covers":{"categories":["technical_documentation","transparency","record_keeping"]},"version":2,"dataset_version":"9710140e23e4","generated_at":"2026-10-06T05:30:01+00:00","citations":34,"downloads":0,"files":[{"format":"docx","filename":"ai-model-card-v2.docx","bytes":12074,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/templates/ai-model-card#download"},{"format":"xlsx","filename":"ai-model-card-v2.xlsx","bytes":22905,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/templates/ai-model-card#download"}],"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/templates/ai-model-card","inside":["Document: twenty questions in seven sections, each with space for the answer","Workbook: the same card as a fill-in sheet with evidence links","Documentation duties sheet: every recorded technical-documentation, transparency and record-keeping duty"],"legal_basis":["eu-ai-act","us-nist-ai-rmf"],"caveat":null,"covered_obligations":[{"slug":"us-california-sb-53-transparency-report","title":"Frontier developers must publish a transparency report before deploying a new frontier model","policy":"us-california-sb-53","source_reference":"Business and Professions Code Section 22757.12 (as added by SB 53)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-sb-53-transparency-report"},{"slug":"us-colorado-admt-advance-notice","title":"Notify consumers before automated decision-making technology influences a consequential decision","policy":"us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act","source_reference":null,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-advance-notice"},{"slug":"us-colorado-admt-adverse-decision-disclosure","title":"Disclose the use of the technology and the principal reasons after an adverse consequential decision","policy":"us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act","source_reference":null,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-adverse-decision-disclosure"},{"slug":"us-colorado-admt-record-keeping","title":"Keep records of consequential decisions influenced by the technology for three years","policy":"us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act","source_reference":null,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-record-keeping"},{"slug":"us-colorado-admt-developer-documentation","title":"Developers must supply deployers with documentation of the technology","policy":"us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act","source_reference":null,"url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-developer-documentation"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-technical-documentation","title":"Draw up technical documentation before placing a high-risk system on the market","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 11 and Annex IV","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-technical-documentation"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-record-keeping","title":"Design high-risk systems to log events automatically","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 12; Article 26(6) for deployers","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-record-keeping"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-transparency-to-deployers","title":"Provide deployers with clear instructions for use","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 13","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-transparency-to-deployers"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-transparency-article-50","title":"Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 50","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-transparency-article-50"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-18-documentation-keeping","title":"Providers must keep high-risk AI documentation for ten years","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 18","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-18-documentation-keeping"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-19-provider-log-retention","title":"Providers must retain automatically generated logs under their control","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 19","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-19-provider-log-retention"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-6-4-non-high-risk-assessment-documentation","title":"Providers must document and register a conclusion that an Annex III system is not high-risk","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 6(4); Article 49(2)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-6-4-non-high-risk-assessment-documentation"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-26-7-worker-information","title":"Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 26(7)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-26-7-worker-information"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-26-11-notice-to-affected-persons","title":"Deployers must tell natural persons that a high-risk AI system is used in decisions about them","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 26(11)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-26-11-notice-to-affected-persons"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-50-2-synthetic-content-marking","title":"Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic output as artificially generated in a machine-readable way","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 50(2)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-50-2-synthetic-content-marking"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-50-3-emotion-recognition-notice","title":"Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must inform exposed persons","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 50(3)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-50-3-emotion-recognition-notice"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-50-4-deepfake-and-public-interest-text-disclosure","title":"Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 50(4)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-50-4-deepfake-and-public-interest-text-disclosure"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-53-gpai-technical-and-downstream-documentation","title":"Providers of GPAI models must maintain technical documentation and inform downstream providers","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 53(1)(a) and 53(1)(b); Annexes XI and XII","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-53-gpai-technical-and-downstream-documentation"},{"slug":"eu-ai-act-art-86-right-to-explanation","title":"Deployers must explain individual decisions taken with high-risk AI on request","policy":"eu-ai-act","source_reference":"Article 86","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-86-right-to-explanation"},{"slug":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-publish-audit-summary","title":"Employers and employment agencies must publish a summary of the bias audit results","policy":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-automated-employment-decision-tools","source_reference":"NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(a)(2); 6 RCNY Section 5-302","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-city-local-law-144-publish-audit-summary"},{"slug":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-candidate-notice","title":"Employers and employment agencies must notify candidates and employees before an automated tool is used","policy":"us-new-york-city-local-law-144-automated-employment-decision-tools","source_reference":"NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(1) and (b)(2); 6 RCNY Section 5-303","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-city-local-law-144-candidate-notice"},{"slug":"singapore-mgf-genai-incident-reporting-and-provenance","title":"Report incidents and mark AI-generated content (generative AI framework)","policy":"singapore-model-ai-governance-framework","source_reference":"Generative AI framework, dimensions on incident reporting and content provenance","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/singapore-mgf-genai-incident-reporting-and-provenance"},{"slug":"singapore-pdpc-ai-notification","title":"Notify individuals about the use of personal data in AI recommendations and decisions","policy":"singapore-pdpc-ai-advisory-guidelines","source_reference":"Advisory guidelines, section on notification obligation","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/singapore-pdpc-ai-notification"},{"slug":"south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-advance-notice-of-high-impact-and-generative-ai","title":"AI business operators must notify users in advance that a product or service runs on high-impact or generative AI","policy":"south-korea-framework-act-on-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-and-establishment-of-a-foundation-for","source_reference":"Article 31(1)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-advance-notice-of-high-impact-and-generative-ai"},{"slug":"south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-generative-output-labelling-and-deepfake-notice","title":"AI business operators must label generative AI output and clearly flag realistic synthetic media","policy":"south-korea-framework-act-on-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-and-establishment-of-a-foundation-for","source_reference":"Article 31(2) and 31(3)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-31-generative-output-labelling-and-deepfake-notice"},{"slug":"south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-34-high-impact-ai-explanation-measures","title":"Operators of high-impact AI must be able to explain outputs and the main criteria behind them","policy":"south-korea-framework-act-on-the-development-of-artificial-intelligence-and-establishment-of-a-foundation-for","source_reference":"Article 34(1)","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-34-high-impact-ai-explanation-measures"},{"slug":"us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga-government-agency-ai-interaction-disclosure","title":"Government agencies must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system","policy":"us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga","source_reference":"Business and Commerce Code Section 551.051","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga-government-agency-ai-interaction-disclosure"},{"slug":"us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga-health-care-ai-disclosure","title":"Health-care providers must disclose the use of AI in patient services","policy":"us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga","source_reference":"Business and Commerce Code Section 551.051","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-texas-responsible-ai-governance-act-traiga-health-care-ai-disclosure"},{"slug":"uk-principles-transparency-explainability","title":"Provide appropriate transparency and explainability","policy":"uk-ai-regulation-white-paper","source_reference":"Principle 2, Part 3","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/uk-principles-transparency-explainability"},{"slug":"us-omb-m-25-21-use-case-inventory","title":"Publish an annual AI use-case inventory","policy":"us-omb-m-25-21","source_reference":"Section 3","url":"https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-omb-m-25-21-use-case-inventory"}],"versions":[{"version":2,"generated_at":"2026-10-06T05:30:01+00:00","dataset_version":"9710140e23e4","changelog":"Dataset bb068ecd9dad → 9710140e23e4.","stats":{"sheets":{"Model card":20,"Documentation duties":30},"blocks":53,"headings":13,"citations":34}},{"version":1,"generated_at":"2026-09-28T10:04:03+00:00","dataset_version":"bb068ecd9dad","changelog":"First version, built from dataset bb068ecd9dad.","stats":{"sheets":{"Model card":20,"Documentation duties":30},"blocks":53,"headings":13,"citations":34}}]},"meta":{"license":"CC BY 4.0","license_url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","disclaimer":"This template is generated from the records on aipolicytracker.org. It is an informational resource, not legal advice, and completing it does not make an organisation compliant with any law or standard. Every row that cites a duty links to the record it came from; check the official source before relying on it."}}