# Human Oversight Procedure

- **Type**: Template (Procedure)
- **Page**: https://aipolicytracker.org/templates/human-oversight-procedure
- **Formats**: DOCX and XLSX
- **Current version**: v6, built 2026-11-12

A procedure for the humans who oversee an AI system: what they must be able to do, when they intervene, how an override is recorded, drawn from every recorded oversight duty.

## What is inside

- Document: roles, competence, the oversight measures each recorded duty requires, intervention and override, escalation
- Override log sheet: date, system, decision overridden, reason, reviewer

## Laws and frameworks it is built from

- EU AI Act (European Union), Pending review · source-linked, checked 26 Sep 2026: https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/eu-ai-act
- Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189) (Colorado (United States)), Pending review · source-linked, checked 26 Sep 2026: https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/us-colorado-automated-decision-making-technology-act

## Recorded duties it covers

- Test and monitor systems, enable human control, and be transparent with users (guardrails 4 to 6) (Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/australia-vaiss-testing-human-control-transparency
- Let consumers opt out of automated decision-making technology for significant decisions, or offer a qualifying human appeal (California CPPA automated decision-making rules): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-ccpa-admt-opt-out
- Offer meaningful human review of an adverse consequential decision (Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189)): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-human-review
- Enable and assign effective human oversight (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-human-oversight
- Employers and employment agencies must let candidates request an alternative selection process or accommodation (NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools)): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-city-local-law-144-alternative-process-request
- Determine the appropriate level of human involvement in AI decisions (Singapore Model AI Governance Framework): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/singapore-mgf-human-involvement
- Operators of high-impact AI must ensure human management and supervision (AI Basic Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/south-korea-ai-basic-act-art-34-high-impact-ai-human-oversight
- Respect the right to object to automated decision-making without human intervention (UAE PDPL): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/uae-pdpl-automated-decision-objection
- Provide routes to contest AI outcomes and seek redress (UK AI regulation framework): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/uk-principles-contestability-redress
- Apply safeguards to solely automated decisions with significant effects (ICO AI guidance): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/uk-ico-automated-decision-safeguards

## Latest changes

Dataset 4559f86f527b → ef1018b7a6a2. Sheet "Oversight duties": 9 → 10 rows (+1). Document: 65 → 71 blocks. Record citations: 18 → 20.

- **Retrieved**: 2026-11-12
- **Licence**: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

> Built from structured summaries of official texts. Not legal advice. A record whose review status is not "verified" has not been confirmed against its official source by a named reviewer; open the official source before relying on any date or duty. How records are verified: https://aipolicytracker.org/verification.