# NIST AI RMF ↔ EU AI Act ↔ ISO/IEC 42001 Crosswalk

- **Type**: Template (Crosswalk)
- **Page**: https://aipolicytracker.org/templates/nist-eu-iso-crosswalk
- **Formats**: XLSX
- **Current version**: v9, built 2026-11-12

Every recorded legal duty against the NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 references it maps to, with the confidence of each mapping, so what is done for one counts for the others.

## What is inside

- Crosswalk sheet: duty, instrument, jurisdiction, NIST reference, ISO reference, confidence, record link
- Coverage sheet: mappings per instrument and framework
- Editorial mappings with a stated confidence, not official crosswalks

## Laws and frameworks it is built from

- EU AI Act (European Union), Pending review · source-linked, checked 26 Sep 2026: https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/eu-ai-act
- NIST AI RMF (United States), Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026: https://aipolicytracker.org/policies/us-nist-ai-rmf

## Recorded duties it covers

- Establish accountability processes and a risk-management process (guardrails 1 and 2) (Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/australia-vaiss-accountability-and-risk-management
- Test and monitor systems, enable human control, and be transparent with users (guardrails 4 to 6) (Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/australia-vaiss-testing-human-control-transparency
- Provide contestability, supply-chain transparency and records (guardrails 7 to 9) (Australian Voluntary AI Safety Standard): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/australia-vaiss-contestability-supply-chain-records
- Give consumers a Pre-use Notice before using automated decision-making technology for a significant decision (California CPPA automated decision-making rules): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-ccpa-admt-pre-use-notice
- Let consumers opt out of automated decision-making technology for significant decisions, or offer a qualifying human appeal (California CPPA automated decision-making rules): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-ccpa-admt-opt-out
- Answer consumers' requests to access information about how automated decision-making technology was used about them (California CPPA automated decision-making rules): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-ccpa-admt-access
- Conduct and document a risk assessment before processing that presents significant risk, including ADMT for significant decisions (California CPPA automated decision-making rules): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-ccpa-risk-assessment
- Submit risk assessment information to the California Privacy Protection Agency each year (California CPPA automated decision-making rules): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-ccpa-risk-assessment-submission
- Large frontier developers must publish a frontier AI framework (California SB 53): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-sb-53-frontier-ai-framework
- Report critical safety incidents to the Office of Emergency Services (California SB 53): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-sb-53-critical-safety-incident-reporting
- Frontier developers must publish a transparency report before deploying a new frontier model (California SB 53): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-sb-53-transparency-report
- Large frontier developers must send periodic summaries of catastrophic-risk assessments to the state (California SB 53): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-sb-53-catastrophic-risk-assessment-summaries
- Frontier developers must protect employees who report catastrophic-risk concerns (California SB 53): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-california-sb-53-whistleblower-protections
- Notify consumers before automated decision-making technology influences a consequential decision (Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189)): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-advance-notice
- Disclose the use of the technology and the principal reasons after an adverse consequential decision (Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189)): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-adverse-decision-disclosure
- Offer meaningful human review of an adverse consequential decision (Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189)): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-human-review
- Keep records of consequential decisions influenced by the technology for three years (Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189)): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-record-keeping
- Developers must supply deployers with documentation of the technology (Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189)): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-admt-developer-documentation
- Do not deploy or provide AI for prohibited practices (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-prohibited-practices
- Ensure AI literacy of staff operating AI systems (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-ai-literacy
- Establish a risk management system for high-risk AI (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-risk-management-system
- Apply data governance and quality criteria to training, validation and testing data (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-data-governance
- Draw up technical documentation before placing a high-risk system on the market (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-technical-documentation
- Design high-risk systems to log events automatically (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-record-keeping
- Provide deployers with clear instructions for use (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-transparency-to-deployers
- Enable and assign effective human oversight (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-human-oversight
- Achieve appropriate accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-accuracy-robustness-cybersecurity
- Operate a quality management system (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-quality-management-system
- Complete conformity assessment, CE marking and EU database registration (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-conformity-assessment-registration
- Use high-risk AI as instructed, monitor it and inform affected people (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-deployer-obligations
- Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-fundamental-rights-impact-assessment
- Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-transparency-article-50
- Meet general-purpose AI model provider obligations (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-gpai-provider-obligations
- Manage systemic risk for high-impact general-purpose models (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-gpai-systemic-risk
- Operate a post-market monitoring system (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-post-market-monitoring
- Report serious incidents to market surveillance authorities (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-serious-incident-reporting
- Verify conformity before importing or distributing high-risk AI (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-importer-distributor-obligations
- Providers must meet the full set of provider duties for high-risk AI (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-16-provider-obligations
- Providers must keep high-risk AI documentation for ten years (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-18-documentation-keeping
- Providers must retain automatically generated logs under their control (EU AI Act): https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-19-provider-log-retention

## Latest changes

Dataset ef1018b7a6a2 → bdc9006d9119.

- **Retrieved**: 2026-11-12
- **Licence**: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

> Built from structured summaries of official texts. Not legal advice. A record whose review status is not "verified" has not been confirmed against its official source by a named reviewer; open the official source before relying on any date or duty. How records are verified: https://aipolicytracker.org/verification.
