MIT AI Risk Repository · Risk Sub-Category · 62.23.02
Deceptive behavior for game-theoretical reasons
Category: Agency (Deception)
Description
"An AI system can display deceptive behavior, such as cheating or bluffing, when engaging in such behavior is a good or optimal game-theoretical strategy to achieve the goals it has been configured to achieve. This tendency can exist in AI systems designed to maximize reward or utility, whether these designs use machine learning or not. The use of deceptive strategies has been demonstrated in both narrow and general AI systems, in both game-playing systems and in systems not explicitly designed to treat humans as opponents, and in systems using both very simple machine learning (e.g., Q-learne
From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024), as extracted by the MIT AI Risk Repository (CC BY 4.0).
Classification
- Causal entity
- AI
- Intent
- Intentional
- Timing
- Post-deployment
Subdomain definition: AI systems that develop, access, or are provided with capabilities that increase their potential to cause mass harm through deception, weapons development and acquisition, persuasion and manipulation, political strategy, cyber-offense, AI development, situational awareness, and self-proliferation. These capabilities may cause mass harm due to malicious human actors, misaligned AI systems, or failure in the AI system.
How other frameworks describe this risk
- Safety Risks from Affordances Provided to LLM-agents
- Agentic LLMs Pose Novel Risks
- Goal-Directedness Incentivizes Undesirable Behaviors
- Capabilities that could be used to reduce human control - Cyber offence
- Capabilities that could be used to reduce human control - Autonomous replication and adaptation
- Capabilities that could be used to reduce human control - Manipulation
- Subagents
- AI Influence