AI incident #45 ·

Defamation via AutoComplete

What happened

Google's autocomplete feature alongside its image search results resulted in the defamation of people and businesses.

Only the incident metadata is stored here. The underlying news reports are on the AI Incident Database (CC BY-SA 4.0); use the links above to read them.

News reports (27)

Coverage catalogued by the AI Incident Database. Titles link to the original publisher; the text is not reproduced here.

  1. Google guilty of defamation, Italian court rules
    computerworld.com · Philip Willan · AIID #799
  2. Google Autocomplete: Former German First Lady Defamation Case
    spiegel.de · Spiegel Online, Hamburg, Stefan Niggemeier · AIID #788
  3. How to Deal with Google Suggest Defamation
    searchenginepeople.com · Dan Virgillito · AIID #781
  4. Defamation via Google search case to be discussed by High Court
    abc.net.au · Ariel Bogle, Nurphoto, Stephen Brashear · AIID #809
  5. Defamation Update: Google under fire again
    mondaq.com · Hannah Marshall, Daisy Von Schoenberg · AIID #796

Who was involved

Alleged deployer
Google
Alleged developer
Google
Alleged harmed party
Varied

Classification (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy)

Risk domain
Misinformation
Causal entity
AI
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm level
AI tangible harm event
Sectors
information and communication
Countries

Risk entries describing this failure mode

Entries from the MIT AI Risk Repository coded to subdomain 3.1.

  • Pursuing Consistent Context

    "LLMs have been demonstrated to pursue consistent context [129]–[132], which may lead to erroneous generation when the prefixes contain false information. Typical examples include sycophancy [129], [130], false demonstra...

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

  • Knowledge Gaps

    "Since the training corpora of LLMs can not contain all possible world knowledge [114]–[119], and it is challenging for LLMs to grasp the long-tail knowledge within their training data [120], [121], LLMs inherently posse...

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

  • Hallucinations

    "LLMs generate nonsensical, untruthful, and factual incorrect content"

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

  • Faithfulness Errors

    "The LLM-generated content could contain inaccurate information" which is is not true to the source material or input used

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

  • Defective Decoding Process

    In general, LLMs employ the Transformer architecture [32] and generate content in an autoregressive manner, where the prediction of the next token is conditioned on the previously generated token sequence. Such a scheme...

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

  • Untruthful Content

    "The LLM-generated content could contain inaccurate information"

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

  • Factuality Errors

    "The LLM-generated content could contain inaccurate information" which is factually incorrect

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

  • Noisy Training Data

    "Another important source of hallucinations is the noise in training data, which introduces errors in the knowledge stored in model parameters [111]–[113]. Generally, the training data inherently harbors misinformation....

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

Incidents in the same risk subdomain

All incidents in this subdomain

Other incidents involving Google