MIT AI Risk Repository · Risk Sub-Category · 62.16.05

General Evaluations (Inaccurate measurement of model encoded human values)

Category: Model Evaluations

Description

"There is a lack of robust frameworks for understanding and evaluating if the output of AI systems robustly conforms to human values, as opposed to if the systems have learned to produce outputs that are only partially correlated with them (i.e., mimicking) [13]. Additionally, outputs by AI models often do not perfectly reflect the representation of human values learned by the model, and it is not known how these values evolve and transition across different stages of model training and deployment. Such evaluations may be especially challenging with LLMs that adopt different personas with diff

From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024), as extracted by the MIT AI Risk Repository (CC BY 4.0).

Classification

Causal entity
Other
Intent
Other
Timing
Other

Subdomain definition: AI systems acting in conflict with human goals or values, especially the goals of designers or users, or ethical standards. These misaligned behaviors may be introduced by humans during design and development, such as through reward hacking and goal misgeneralisation, or may result from AI using dangerous capabilities such as manipulation, deception, situational awareness to seek power, self-proliferate, or achieve other goals.

Real-world incidents in this subdomain

Browse all incidents in this subdomain

How other frameworks describe this risk

Other entries from Gipiškis2024