MIT AI Risk Repository · Risk Sub-Category · 62.22.01

Specification gaming

Category: Agency (Goal-Directedness)

Description

"AI systems can achieve user-specified tasks in undesirable ways unless they are specified carefully and in enough detail. AI systems might find an easier unintended way to accomplish the objective provided by the user or developer, so that the actions by the AI system taken during its execution are very different from what the user expected [75, 191]. This behavior arises not from a problem with the learning algorithm, but rather from the misspecification or underspeci- fication of the intended task, and is generally referred to as specification gaming [43]."

From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024), as extracted by the MIT AI Risk Repository (CC BY 4.0).

Classification

Causal entity
AI

Subdomain definition: AI systems acting in conflict with human goals or values, especially the goals of designers or users, or ethical standards. These misaligned behaviors may be introduced by humans during design and development, such as through reward hacking and goal misgeneralisation, or may result from AI using dangerous capabilities such as manipulation, deception, situational awareness to seek power, self-proliferate, or achieve other goals.

Real-world incidents in this subdomain

Browse all incidents in this subdomain

How other frameworks describe this risk

Other entries from Gipiškis2024