MIT AI Risk Repository · Risk Sub-Category · 62.24.02

Strategic underperformance on model evaluations

Category: Agency (Situational Awareness)

Description

"GPAI developers often run evaluations ofual-use capabilities to decide whether it is safe to deploy. In some cases, these evaluations may fail to elicit these capabilities, either due to benign reasons or strategic action - by either the de- velopers, malicious actors, or arise unintentionally in the model during training [84, 97]. A GPAI model may strategically underperform or limit its performance during capability evaluations in order to be classified as safe for deployment. This underperformance could prevent the model from being identified as potentially dual use."

From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024), as extracted by the MIT AI Risk Repository (CC BY 4.0).

Classification

Causal entity
AI

Subdomain definition: AI systems acting in conflict with human goals or values, especially the goals of designers or users, or ethical standards. These misaligned behaviors may be introduced by humans during design and development, such as through reward hacking and goal misgeneralisation, or may result from AI using dangerous capabilities such as manipulation, deception, situational awareness to seek power, self-proliferate, or achieve other goals.

Real-world incidents in this subdomain

Browse all incidents in this subdomain

How other frameworks describe this risk

Other entries from Gipiškis2024