Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker
Legal requirement Accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity European Union Partially applicable

Achieve appropriate accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity

Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder EU AI Act, Article 15

Pending review · linked to the official source, waiting for a reviewer to confirm it (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
What this label means
Verified
— a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
Pending review
— linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
Source-linked
— linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
Verification policy and current standing · a factual check, not legal advice.
No change recorded as of 26 Sep 2026 · official source last checked
On this page 9 sections

In brief

Achieve appropriate accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity is a legal requirement under the EU AI Act in the European Union (Article 15). High-risk AI systems must achieve an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity and perform consistently throughout their lifecycle. It applies from 2 December 2027. The record carries 2 evidence examples and mappings to 3 frameworks.

Instrument
EU AI Act
Jurisdiction
European Union
Nature
Legal requirement
Source reference
Article 15
Applies from
2 December 2027
Who it binds
Provider / developer
Evidence examples
2
Framework mappings
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
Controls that meet it
3
Official source
Open official text
Verification
Pending review · source-linked

What does it require?

High-risk AI systems must achieve an appropriate level of accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity and perform consistently throughout their lifecycle. Accuracy levels and metrics must be declared in the instructions; systems must be resilient to errors, faults and inconsistencies, address feedback loops in continuously learning systems, and resist attempts to alter use or performance, including data poisoning, model poisoning, adversarial examples and confidentiality attacks.

Practical action

Include AI-specific threat modelling and adversarial testing in your security programme.

Who does it apply to?

Providers of high-risk AI systems.

Applies from:

Which controls meet this duty?

Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.

  • satisfiesTechnical measureQuality or testing lead · at launch and on material change
    Accuracy, robustness, fairness and security testing

    Serves 15 recorded duties · evidence: Pre-release test report, Test plan and acceptance criteria, Release test sign-off

    Declared accuracy metrics, robustness and AI-specific security testing come from the release test programme.

  • supportsTechnical measureAI security or safety lead · at launch and on material change
    Adversarial and red-team testing for generative AI

    Serves 8 recorded duties · evidence: Red-team exercise report, Red-team rules of engagement and scenario library, Adversarial findings tracker

    Adversarial exercises cover poisoning, evasion and extraction attempts.

  • supportsTechnical measureAI system owner · continuous
    Post-deployment monitoring and drift detection

    Serves 10 recorded duties · evidence: Post-market monitoring plan, Monitoring dashboard or periodic monitoring report, Monitoring review decision

    Consistent performance over the lifecycle is confirmed in operation.

Templates that cover this duty

Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.

All 8 templates that cover it →

What evidence would a reviewer expect?

Evidence examples
EvidenceTypeNotes
Accuracy metrics and test evidencereport
AI security assessmentreport

Framework mappings

Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.

See every European Union duty mapped this way →

Framework mappings table
FrameworkReferenceNoteConfidence
ISO/IEC 42001:2023Annex A controls on AI system verification and validationOriginal editorial mapping.medium
ISO/IEC 27001:2022Clause 8 and Annex A security controlsOriginal editorial mapping for cybersecurity aspects.medium
NIST AI RMF 1.0MEASURE 2.5, 2.6, 2.7Validity, safety, security and resilience measurement.high

Frequently asked questions

Is this a legal requirement?

Yes. It is a legal requirement under EU AI Act (Article 15).

Who must comply with this obligation?

Providers of high-risk AI systems.

When does this obligation apply?

It applies from 2 December 2027.

What evidence shows compliance?

A reviewer would expect: Accuracy metrics and test evidence; AI security assessment.

Which frameworks map to this obligation?

It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A controls on AI system verification and validation, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clause 8 and Annex A security controls, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 MEASURE 2.5, 2.6, 2.7. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.

Which controls satisfy this obligation?

Adversarial and red-team testing for generative AI; Accuracy, robustness, fairness and security testing; Post-deployment monitoring and drift detection.

What should an organisation do in practice?

Include AI-specific threat modelling and adversarial testing in your security programme.

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Achieve appropriate accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity (EU AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0012, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0012 (accessed 27 October 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0012: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.

Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.

BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_achieveappropriateaccura,
  author       = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
  title        = {{Achieve appropriate accuracy, robustness and cybersecurity (EU AI Act)}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-accuracy-robustness-cybersecurity}},
  url          = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-accuracy-robustness-cybersecurity},
  urldate      = {2026-10-27},
  note         = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 27 October 2026}
}

Change history

No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.

Similar obligations in other instruments

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.