AI incident #1171 ·
Reported Hack of Tea Dating App Compromises Data from Purportedly AI-Supported Identity and Image Checks
What happened
In July 2025, the Tea dating advice app, which purportedly uses AI-assisted tools for user verification and reverse image search, reportedly suffered a breach of a legacy storage system. Hackers allegedly accessed about 72,000 images, including selfies, photo IDs, and other content, which were purportedly circulated on 4chan. The incident reportedly exposed sensitive data of users who signed up before February 2024.
Only the incident metadata is stored here. The underlying news reports are on the AI Incident Database (CC BY-SA 4.0); use the links above to read them.
News reports (2)
Coverage catalogued by the AI Incident Database. Titles link to the original publisher; the text is not reproduced here.
Who was involved
- Alleged deployer
- Tea Dating Advice
- Alleged developer
- Tea Dating Advice
- Alleged harmed party
- Women and girls Women Users of the Tea app Users of Tea Dating Advice Privacy General public
AI systems implicated
Classification (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy)
- Risk domain
- Privacy & Security
- Risk subdomain
- 2.2 AI system security vulnerabilities and attacks
- Causal entity
- Other
- Intent
- Other
- Timing
- Post-deployment
- Harm level
- —
- Sectors
- —
- Countries
- —
Risk entries describing this failure mode
Entries from the MIT AI Risk Repository coded to subdomain 2.2.
- Privacy loss
"Privacy loss - Unwarranted exposure of an individual’s private life or personal data through cyberattacks, doxxing, etc."
- Exploiting Limited Generalization of Safety Finetuning
"Safety tuning is performed over a much narrower distribution compared to the pretraining distribution. This leaves the model vulnerable to attacks that exploit gaps in the generalization of the safety training, e.g. usi...
- Jailbreaks and Prompt Injections Threaten Security of LLMs
"LLMs are not adversarially robust and are vulnerable to security failures such as jailbreaks and prompt-injection attacks. While a number of jailbreak attacks have been proposed in the literature, the lack of standardiz...
- “Model Psychology” Attacks
"LLMs are vulnerable to “psychological” tricks (Li et al., 2023e; Shen et al., 2023), which can be exploited by attackers. Examples include instructing the model to behave like a specific persona (Shah et al., 2023; Andr...
- Attacking LLMs via Additional Modalities a
"LLMs can now process modalities other than text, e.g. images or video frames (OpenAI, 2023c; Gemini Team, 2023). Several studies show that gradient-based attacks on multimodal models are easy and effective (Carlini et a...
- Vulnerability to Poisoning and Backdoors
"The previous section explored jailbreaks and other forms of adversarial prompts as ways to elicit harmful capabilities acquired during pretraining. These methods make no assumptions about the training data. On the other...
- Model Attacks
Model attacks exploit the vulnerabilities of LLMs, aiming to steal valuable information or lead to incorrect responses.
- Hardware Vulnerabilities
"The vulnerabilities of hardware systems for training and inferencing brings issues to LLM-based applications."
Related incidents on the AI Incident Database
Linked by AIID editors or by its text-similarity model.
Incidents in the same risk subdomain
- COEMPT Quality Assurance Engineers Allegedly Violated Indian CBSE Student Data Privacy Rights by Processing It with Google Gemini
- Hidden Prompt Injection in Brazilian Labor-Court Petition Reportedly Tried to Manipulate Galileu
- Meta Internal AI Agent Reportedly Gave Advice That Allegedly Exposed Sensitive Data to Unauthorized Employees
- CodeWall's Autonomous Agent Reportedly Obtained Unauthorized Access to McKinsey's Lilli AI Platform Database
- Anthropic Said DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax Used Fraudulent Accounts and Proxies to Illicitly Distill Claude Capabilities at Scale
- DJI Romo Cloud Authorization Bug Reportedly Exposed Camera, Microphone, and Home-Mapping Data From Nearly 7,000 Robot Vacuums