MIT AI Risk Repository · Risk Sub-Category · 73.07.02
“Model Psychology” Attacks
Category: Jailbreaks and Prompt Injections Threaten Security of LLMs
Description
"LLMs are vulnerable to “psychological” tricks (Li et al., 2023e; Shen et al., 2023), which can be exploited by attackers. Examples include instructing the model to behave like a specific persona (Shah et al., 2023; Andreas, 2022), or employing various “social engineering” tricks crafted by humans (Wei et al., 2023c) or other LLMs (Perez et al., 2022b; Casper et al., 2023c)."
From Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models (Anwar2024), as extracted by the MIT AI Risk Repository (CC BY 4.0).
Classification
- Domain
- 2. Privacy & Security
- Causal entity
- Human
- Intent
- Intentional
- Timing
- Post-deployment
Subdomain definition: Vulnerabilities in AI systems, software development toolchains, and hardware that can be exploited, resulting in unauthorized access, data and privacy breaches, or system manipulation causing unsafe outputs or behavior.
Real-world incidents in this subdomain
- COEMPT Quality Assurance Engineers Allegedly Violated Indian CBSE Student Data Privacy Rights by Processing It with Google Gemini
- Hidden Prompt Injection in Brazilian Labor-Court Petition Reportedly Tried to Manipulate Galileu
- Meta Internal AI Agent Reportedly Gave Advice That Allegedly Exposed Sensitive Data to Unauthorized Employees
- CodeWall's Autonomous Agent Reportedly Obtained Unauthorized Access to McKinsey's Lilli AI Platform Database
- Anthropic Said DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax Used Fraudulent Accounts and Proxies to Illicitly Distill Claude Capabilities at Scale
- DJI Romo Cloud Authorization Bug Reportedly Exposed Camera, Microphone, and Home-Mapping Data From Nearly 7,000 Robot Vacuums
How other frameworks describe this risk
Other entries from Anwar2024
- Agentic LLMs Pose Novel Risks
- Natural Language Underspecifies Goals
- Goal-Directedness Incentivizes Undesirable Behaviors
- Safety Risks from Affordances Provided to LLM-agents
- Multi-Agent Safety Is Not Assured by Single-Agent Safety
- Foundationality May Cause Correlated Failures
- Groups of LLM-Agents May Show Emergent Functionality
- Collusion between LLM-Agents
- Dual-Use Capabilities Enable Malicious Use and Misuse of LLMs
- Misinformation and Manipulation
- Cybersecurity
- Cybersecurity