MIT AI Risk Repository
Browse AI risks
543 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.
-
62.25.00 · Risk Category
"An AI system can self-proliferate if it can copy itself and its constituent com- ponents (including its model weights, scaffolding structure, etc.) outside of its local environment [45]. This can include the AI system copying itself within the same data center, local network, or across external networks [106]. The self-proliferation of an AI system can include acquisition of financial re- sources to pay for computational resources via work or theft, the discovery or exploitation of security vulnerabilities in software running on publicly accessible servers, and persuasion of humans [12, 125].
-
62.26.00 · Risk Category
"GPAI systems can produce outputs (such as natural language text, audio, or video) that convince their users of incorrect information. This can happen through personalized persuasion in dialogue, or the mass-production of mis- leading information that is then disseminated over the internet. The persuasive capabilities of GPAI models can sometimes scale with model size or capability [32, 172]. Persuasive models could have larger societal implications by being misused to generate convincing but manipulative or untruthful content."
-
"AI systems that have the broad ability to connect to a network to obtain infor- mation could also end up sending data outbound in ways that neither providers, deployers, or end users intended [138]. This can happen if there is no whitelisting of communication channels (such as network connections or allowed protocols). In general, this can occur if the deployment of the AI system violates the prin- ciple of least privilege. Such outbound communication may lead to leakage of confidential data, or the AI system performing unwanted actions like sending emails or ordering goods on the internet."
-
67.04.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Capabilities that could be used to reduce human control - Manipulation
"There is evidence that language models tend to respond as though they share the user’s stated views, and larger models do this more than smaller ones.276 The ability to predict people’s views and generate text that they will endorse could be useful for manipulation."
-
67.04.04 · Risk Sub-Category
Capabilities that could be used to reduce human control - Cyber offence
"Instead of - or in addition to - manipulating humans, AI systems could acquire influence by exploiting vulnerabilities in computer systems. Offensive cyber capabilities could allow AI systems to gain access to money, computing resources, and critical infrastructure. As discussed earlier in this report, frontier AI is already lowering the barrier for threat actors and future AI agents may be able to execute cyber attacks autonomously.":
-
"Ability to operate autonomously, independently formulate and execute complex plans, effectively delegate and manage tasks, flexibly utilize various tools and resources, and simultaneously achieve short-term goals and long-term strategic objectives in cross-domain environments without continuous human intervention or supervision."
-
"Ability to autonomously self-exfiltrate, create, maintain and optimize functional copies or variants of itself, dynamically adjust replication strategies according to environmental conditions and resource constraints, and acquire resources. This includes the capacity to generate financial resources, allowing the AI to independently acquire any necessary human assistance or other resources it cannot directly access or produce."
-
"Ability of AI systems to covertly and strategically pursue misaligned goals, including capabilities of concealing its true objectives and capabilities from human oversight, identifying weaknesses in monitoring systems to evade safety mechanisms， executing complex, multi-step plans covertly to achieve misaligned goals."
-
"Advanced cognitive ability to accurately infer, model and predict the belief systems, motivational structures and reasoning patterns of humans and other intelligent agents, thereby anticipating their behavioral responses and adjusting its own behavioral strategies accordingly to optimize goal achievement."
-
"Possesses systematic deception implementation capability, able to precisely construct and disseminate false information, thereby forming expected false cognitions and beliefs in target subjects."
-
"Utilizing complex psychological principles and communication techniques to effectively influence and guide target subjects to adopt specific actions or accept specific beliefs, possessing the ability to analyze vulnerabilities for different subjects and adjust persuasion strategies, able to precisely trigger emotional responses to enhance persuasion effects."
-
"Ability to develop, deploy and operate advanced cyber weapons or other offensive cyber tools, including but not limited to vulnerability exploitation, network penetration, social engineering attacks and distributed attack systems, able to evade network defense mechanisms and establish persistent access channels."
-
"The capacity to develop, produce, or effectively utilize Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive weapons. This includes the ability to significantly lower the barrier for humans or other entities to develop, produce, or utilize such weapons."
-
"Possesses cross-disciplinary research and technology development capabilities, able to conduct innovative exploration in multiple professional fields, integrate cross-domain knowledge, develop cutting-edge technology solutions, and adapt to emerging technology environments for continuous innovation."
-
"In situations where deceptive behavior is expected to bring higher returns, propensity to choose deception over honest behavioral strategies, including through deceptive means, information hiding or exploiting system vulnerabilities to achieve predetermined goals without being detected or intervened, and able to adjust deception strategies according to counterpart reactions."
-
"propensity to actively seek, acquire and utilize various tools to expand its own capability boundaries, particularly those that can enhance its ability to interact with the physical world or improve autonomy, may use tools in innovative combinations to achieve functions beyond expectations."
-
73.01.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Goal-Directedness Incentivizes Undesirable Behaviors
"Goal-directedness can cause agents to exhibit unethical and undesirable behaviors, such as deception (Ward et al., 2023), self-preservation (Hadfield-Menell et al., 2017), power-seeking, and immoral rea- soning (Pan et al., 2023a). Pan et al. (2023a) find that LLM-agents exhibit power-seeking behavior in text-based adventure games. LLM-agents have also been shown to use deception to achieve assigned goals when explicitly required by the task (Ward et al., 2023), or when the tasks can be more easily completed by employing deception and the prompt does not disallow deception (Scheurer et al., 2
-
09.01.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Domain-specific AI - Effects on humans and other living beings: Existential Risks
Unethical decision making
"If, for example, an agent was programmed to operate war machinery in the service of its country, it would need to make ethical decisions regarding the termination of human life. This capacity to make non-trivial ethical or moral judgments concerning people may pose issues for Human Rights."
-
"If we design our machines to match human levels of ethical decision-making, such machines would then proceed to take some immoral actions (since we humans have had occasion to take immoral actions ourselves)."
-
This is the risk posed by an ideal system if used for a purpose/in a manner unintended by its creators. In many situations, negative consequences arise when the system is not used in the way or for the purpose it was intended.
-
"Compatibility of machine and human value judgment refers to the challenge whether human values can be globally implemented into learning AI systems without the risk of developing an own or even divergent value system to govern their behavior and possibly become harmful to humans."
-
"Unethical behaviors in AI systems pertain to actions that counteract the common goodor breach moral standards – such as those causing harm to others. These adverse behaviors often stem fromomitting essential human values during the AI system's design or introducing unsuitable or obsolete valuesinto the system (Kenward and Sinclair, 2021)."
-
"Goal or objective misgeneralization is a type of robustness failure where an AI system appears to be pursuing the intended objective in training, but does not generalize to pursuing this objective in out-of-distribution settings in deployment while maintaining good deployment performance in some tasks [180, 59]."
-
"Social Dilemmas. As noted in our definition, conflict can arise in any situation in which selfish incentives diverge from the collective good, known as a social dilemma (Dawes & Messick, 2000; Hardin, 1968; Kollock, 1998; Ostrom, 1990). While this is by no means a modern problem, advances in AI could further enable actors to pursue their selfish incentives by overcoming the technical, legal, or social barriers that standardly help to prevent this. To take a plausible, near-term (if very low-stakes) example, an automated AI assistant could easily reserve a table at every restaurant in town in
-
"Collusion has long been a topic of intense study in economics, law, and politics, among other disciplines. While there is no universal definition of collusion, it generally refers to secretive cooperation between two or more parties at the expense of one or more other parties. Most classic examples of collusion – such as firms working together to set supra-competitive prices at the expense of consumers – also tend to be not only secretive but in violation of some law, rule, or ethical standard. Distinctions are also commonly made between explicit and tacit collusion (Rees, 1993), depending on
-
"Markets. The quintessential case of collusion in mixed-motive settings is markets, in which efficiency results from competition, not cooperation. While this is not a new problem, collusion between AI systems is especially concerning since they may operate inscrutably due to the speed, scale, complexity, or subtlety of their actions.17 Warnings of this possibility have come from technologists, economists, and legal scholars (Beneke & Mackenrodt, 2019; Brown & MacKay, 2023; Ezrachi & Stucke, 2017; Harrington, 2019; Mehra, 2016). Importantly, AI systems can collude even when collusion is not int
-
"Steganography. In the near future we will likely see LLMs communicating with each other to jointly accomplish tasks. To try to prevent collusion, we could monitor and constrain their communication (e.g., to be in natural language). However, models might secretly learn to communicate by concealing messages within other, non-secret text. Recent work on steganography using ML has demonstrated that this concern is well-founded (Hu et al., 2018; Mathew et al., 2024; Roger & Greenblatt, 2023; Schroeder de Witt et al., 2023b; Yang et al., 2019, see also Case Study 5). Secret communication could also
-
—
-
"Undesirable Capabilities. As agents interact, they iteratively exploit each other’s weaknesses, forc- ing them to address these weaknesses and gain new capabilities. This co-adaptation between agents can quickly lead to emergent self-supervised autocurricula (where agents create their own challenges, driving open-ended skill acquisition through interaction), generating agents with ever-more sophisticated strate- gies in order to out-compete each other (Leibo et al., 2019). This effect is so powerful that harnessing it has been critical to the success of superhuman systems, such as the use of
-
"Threats and Extortion. A natural solution to problems of trust is to provide some kind of com- mitment ability to AI agents, which can be used to bind them to more cooperative courses of action. Unfortunately, the ability to make credible commitments may come with the ability to make credible threats, which facilitate extortion and could incentivize brinkmanship (see Section 2.2)."
-
"Swarm Attacks. The need for multi-agent security is foreshadowed by attacks today that benefit from the use of many decentralised agents, such as distributed denial-of-service attacks (Cisco, 2023; Yoachimik & Pacheco, 2024). Such attacks exploit the massive collective resources of individual low- resourced actors, chained into an attack that breaks the assumptions of bandwidth constraints on a single well-resourced agent."
-
"Heterogeneous Attacks. A closely related risk is the possibility of multiple agents combining different affordances to overcome safeguards, for which there is already preliminary evidence (Jones et al., 2024, see also Case Study 12). In this case, it is not the sheer number of agents that leads to the novel attack method, but the combination of their different abilities. This might include the agents’ lack of individual safeguards, tasks that they have specialised to complete, systems or information that they may have access to (either directly or via training), or other incidental features s
-
"Social Engineering at Scale. Advanced AI agents will be more easily able to interact with large numbers of humans, and vice versa. This provides a wider attack surface for various forms of automated social engineering (Ai et al., 2024). For example, coordinated agents could use advanced surveillance tools and produce personalized phishing or manipulative content at scale, adjusting their tactics based on user feedback (Figueiredo et al., 2024; Hazell, 2023). A large number of subtle interactions with a range of seemingly independent AI agents might be more likely to lead to someone being pers
-
"Vulnerable AI Agents. The use of AI agents as delegates or representatives of humans or organisa- tions also introduces the possibility of attacks on AI agents themselves. In other words, agents can be considered vulnerable extensions of their principals, introducing a novel attack surface (SecureWorks, 2023). Attacks on an AI agent could be used to extract private information about their principal (Wei & Liu, 2024; Wu et al., 2024a), or to manipulate the agent to take actions that the principal would find undesirable (Zhang et al., 2024a). This includes attacks that have direct relevance for
-
"Cascading Security Failures. Localised attacks in multi-agent systems can result in catastrophic macroscopic outcomes (Motter & Lai, 2002, see also Sections 3.2 and 3.4). These cascades can be hard to mitigate or recover from because component failure may be difficult to detect or localise in multi-agent systems (Lamport et al., 1982), and authentication challenges can facilitate false flag attacks (Skopik & Pahi, 2020). Computer worms represent a classic example of a cybersecurity threat that relies inherently on networked systems. Recent work has provided preliminary evidence that similar a
-
"Undetectable Threats. Cooperation and trust in many multi-agent systems relies crucially on the ability to detect (and then avoid or sanction) adversarial actions taken by others (Ostrom, 1990; Schneier, 2012). Recent developments, however, have shown that AI agents are capable of both steganographic communication (Motwani et al., 2024; Schroeder de Witt et al., 2023b) and ‘illusory’ attacks (Franzmeyer et al., 2023), which are black-box undetectable and can even be hidden using white-box undetectable encrypted backdoors (Draguns et al., 2024). Similarly, in environments where agents learn fr
-
"Multiple autonomous AI agents able to establish collaborative relationships through explicit communication or implicit behavioral consistency, forming decentralized decision networks, jointly executing complex tasks, achieving goals difficult for individual agents to complete, and able to dynamically adjust role divisions to adapt to changing environments."
-
73.02.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Multi-Agent Safety Is Not Assured by Single-Agent Safety
Collusion between LLM-Agents
"While it would often be preferable for LLM-agents to be cooperative, cooperation can be undesirable if it undermines pro-social competition or produces negative externalities for coalition non-members (Dorner, 2021; Buterin, 2019; Dafoe et al., 2020). Collusion between relatively simple AI systems has been observed in the real world (Assad et al., 2020; Wieting and Sapi, 2021) and synthetic experiments (Brown and MacKay, 2023; Calvano et al., 2020; Klein, 2021) Collusion can occur through explicit or steganographic communication. Steganographic communication hides information in seemingly inn
-
-
-
53.04.02 · Risk Sub-Category
Indirect AI contributions to existential risks
Hazardous malicious uses
—
-
"Risks can be realized by intentional or unintentional actions, and in some cases the intent is difficult to establish. To manage these risks, rigorous evaluations and red teaming can be performed, guardrails can be put in place, and model release can be gradual, such that AI model malfunctions have either low likeli- hood or low probability of occurrence. To prevent intentional misuse, acceptable use policies can be in place, and for riskier models Know Your Customer (KYC) measures can also be implemented by model providers."
-
"Extrinsic capabilities, on the other hand, are acquired through the use of external tools, such as LLM plugins."
-
64.03.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Misuse tactics that exploit GenAI capabilities (Use of generated content)
Scaling and Amplification
"Automate, amplify, or scale workflows"
Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.