Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker
Legal requirement Impact assessment European Union Partially applicable

Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment

Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder EU AI Act, Article 27

Pending review · linked to the official source, waiting for a reviewer to confirm it (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
What this label means
Verified
— a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
Pending review
— linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
Source-linked
— linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
Verification policy and current standing · a factual check, not legal advice.
No change recorded as of 26 Sep 2026 · official source last checked
On this page 9 sections

In brief

Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment is a legal requirement under the EU AI Act in the European Union (Article 27). It applies from 2 December 2027. The record carries 1 evidence example and mappings to 2 frameworks.

Instrument
EU AI Act
Jurisdiction
European Union
Nature
Legal requirement
Source reference
Article 27
Applies from
2 December 2027
Who it binds
Deployer / user organisation, Public authority / government body
Evidence examples
1
Framework mappings
ISO/IEC 42001:2023, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0
Controls that meet it
2
Official source
Open official text
Verification
Pending review · source-linked

What does it require?

Before deploying most Annex III high-risk systems, deployers that are bodies governed by public law or private entities providing public services, and deployers using systems for creditworthiness assessment or life and health insurance pricing, must assess the impact on fundamental rights: the processes, period and frequency of use, categories of affected persons, specific risks of harm, human-oversight measures and mitigation, and notify the market-surveillance authority of the results.

Practical action

Reuse GDPR DPIA workflows and extend them with the Article 27 elements; the AI Office is to provide a template.

Who does it apply to?

Public bodies, private providers of public services, and deployers in credit and insurance use cases.

Applies from:

Which controls meet this duty?

Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.

  • satisfiesProcessAI system owner · once per ai system
    AI impact and fundamental-rights impact assessment

    Serves 11 recorded duties · evidence: AI impact assessment, Impact assessment approval, Impact assessment procedure and template

    A rights-focused assessment template covering the required elements.

  • supportsProcessData protection officer · once per ai system
    Privacy and data-protection controls for AI

    Serves 13 recorded duties · evidence: Data protection impact assessment for an AI system, AI data-flow and legal-basis record, Privacy notice section on AI use

    Reuse of the DPIA workflow and findings.

Templates that cover this duty

Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.

All 10 templates that cover it →

What evidence would a reviewer expect?

Evidence examples
EvidenceTypeNotes
Fundamental rights impact assessment reportreport

Framework mappings

Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.

See every European Union duty mapped this way →

Framework mappings table
FrameworkReferenceNoteConfidence
ISO/IEC 42001:2023Clause 6.1.4 AI system impact assessment; Annex A control on impact assessmentOriginal editorial mapping.high
NIST AI RMF 1.0MAP 5.1, MAP 5.2Impacts on individuals, groups and society.medium

Frequently asked questions

Is this a legal requirement?

Yes. It is a legal requirement under EU AI Act (Article 27).

Who must comply with this obligation?

Public bodies, private providers of public services, and deployers in credit and insurance use cases.

When does this obligation apply?

It applies from 2 December 2027.

What evidence shows compliance?

A reviewer would expect: Fundamental rights impact assessment report.

Which frameworks map to this obligation?

It is mapped to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 6.1.4 AI system impact assessment; Annex A control on impact assessment, NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 MAP 5.1, MAP 5.2. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.

Which controls satisfy this obligation?

AI impact and fundamental-rights impact assessment; Privacy and data-protection controls for AI.

What should an organisation do in practice?

Reuse GDPR DPIA workflows and extend them with the Article 27 elements; the AI Office is to provide a template.

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment (EU AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0016, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0016 (accessed 27 October 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0016: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.

Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.

BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_carryoutafundamentalrigh,
  author       = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
  title        = {{Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment (EU AI Act)}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-fundamental-rights-impact-assessment}},
  url          = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-fundamental-rights-impact-assessment},
  urldate      = {2026-10-27},
  note         = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 27 October 2026}
}

Change history

No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.

Similar obligations in other instruments

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.