Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

Impact assessment: AI obligations

Practical requirements extracted from policy instruments, with the source article, the actors they bind, evidence examples and original framework mappings. Legal requirements are marked; everything else is voluntary guidance.

Results

7 of 117 obligations match · Download these as CSV

Legal requirement Impact assessment United Kingdom

Carry out a data protection impact assessment for high-risk AI processing

ICO AI guidance · UK GDPR Article 35; ICO guidance, accountability and governance section

Where AI processing of personal data is likely to result in a high risk to individuals, UK GDPR requires a DPIA before processing begins. The ICO treats most AI involving profiling, large-scale processing or novel technology as meeting this threshold.

Source-linked (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Legal requirement Impact assessment European Union

Carry out a fundamental rights impact assessment before deployment

EU AI Act · Article 27

Before deploying most Annex III high-risk systems, deployers that are bodies governed by public law or private entities providing public services, and deployers using systems for creditworthiness assessment or life and health insurance pricing, must assess the impact on fundamental rights: the processes, period and frequency of use, categories of affected persons, specific risks of harm, human-oversight measures and mitigation, and notify the market-surveillance authority of the results.

Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review) Applies from 2 Dec 2027
Legal requirement Impact assessment United Arab Emirates

Conduct a data protection impact assessment for high-risk processing using new technologies

UAE PDPL · Article on data protection impact assessment (reviewer to cite article number)

Before processing that uses modern technologies and is likely to pose a high risk to privacy, controllers must assess the impact on personal data protection, covering the processing, its purposes, risks and safeguards.

Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Legal requirement Impact assessment Colorado (United States)

Deployers must complete impact assessments for high-risk AI

Colorado AI Act · C.R.S. 6-1-1703(3)

Deployers must complete an impact assessment before deployment, annually, and within 90 days of any intentional and substantial modification, covering purpose, risks of algorithmic discrimination and mitigation, data categories, performance metrics, transparency measures and post-deployment monitoring, and retain assessments for at least three years.

Pending review (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Legal requirement Impact assessment India

Significant Data Fiduciaries must appoint a DPO and run impact assessments and audits

India DPDP Act · Section 10

Entities notified as Significant Data Fiduciaries, based on factors such as volume and sensitivity of data and risk to individuals, must appoint a Data Protection Officer based in India, an independent data auditor, and periodically undertake data protection impact assessments and audits.

Source-linked (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Voluntary guidance Impact assessment United States

Map context, intended use and potential impacts (Map)

NIST AI RMF · MAP function

Map establishes the context: intended purposes, users, deployment settings, legal requirements, risk categorisation, benefits and costs, and impacts on individuals, groups, communities and society.

Source-linked (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Voluntary guidance Impact assessment South Korea

Operators of high-impact AI should assess its impact on fundamental rights before use

AI Basic Act · Article 35

An AI business operator that provides high-impact AI, or a product or service using it, is to make efforts to assess in advance the impact the AI may have on people's fundamental rights. The provision is drafted as an endeavour duty rather than a hard requirement, but public bodies procuring high-impact AI are directed to give preference to products that have undergone such an assessment, and the ministry may set assessment methods.

Verified (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review) Applies from 22 Jan 2026

Frequently asked questions

What is an obligation on this site?

A single practical requirement pulled out of an instrument and stated on its own: keep a risk management system, log incidents, document training data, provide human oversight, and so on. Each one cites the article or section it comes from so you can check it against the source.

Does a voluntary obligation have legal force?

No, and every obligation is labelled either a legal requirement or voluntary guidance. Voluntary items still matter in practice, because procurement questionnaires and auditors ask about them, but only the binding ones carry legal consequence.

How do I find the obligations that apply to my organisation?

Filter by jurisdiction, category, actor, sector or use case. The applicability check asks a short set of questions and returns the duties that may reach you. It is an educational screen, not a legal determination, and it says so.

Why do some instruments have no obligations listed?

Because nobody has broken them out yet. Most instruments are recorded at summary level first; obligations are added jurisdiction by jurisdiction. The coverage and open-gaps pages publish exactly what is missing rather than hiding it.