MIT AI Risk Repository · Risk Sub-Category · 19.05.07
Technological arms race with autonomous weapons
Category: Ethical AI Risks
Description
—
From Governance of artificial intelligence: A risk and guideline-based integrative framework (Wirtz2022), as extracted by the MIT AI Risk Repository (CC BY 4.0).
Classification
- Subdomain
- 6.4 Competitive dynamics
- Causal entity
- Other
- Intent
- Unintentional
- Timing
- Post-deployment
Subdomain definition: AI developers or state-like actors competing in an AI ‘race’ by rapidly developing, deploying, and applying AI systems to maximize strategic or economic advantage, increasing the risk they release unsafe and error-prone systems.
Real-world incidents in this subdomain
- Korean Internet Portal Giant Naver Manipulated Shopping and Video Search Algorithms to Favor In-House Services
- Apple Tweaked App Store Ranking Algorithms, Allegedly Resulted in Demotion of Local Apps in China
- Inefficiencies in the United States Resident Matching Program
How other frameworks describe this risk
Other entries from Wirtz2022
- Technological, Data and Analytical AI Risks
- Loss of control of autonomous systems and unforeseen behaviour due to lack of transparency and self-programming/ reprogramming
- Programming error
- Lack of data, poor data quality, and biases in training data
- Vulnerability of AI systems to attacks and misuse
- Lack of AI experts with comprehensive AI knowledge
- Immaturity of AI technology can cause incorrect decisions
- High investment costs of AI hinder integration
- Informational and Communicational AI Risks
- Manipulation and control of information provision (e.g., personalised adds, filtered news)
- Disinformation and computational propaganda
- Censorship of opinions expressed in the Internet restricts freedom of expression