MIT AI Risk Repository · Risk Sub-Category · 63.07.02

Cyclic Behaviour

Category: Destabilising Dynamics

Open the MIT Risk Navigator All entries from Hammond2025

Description

"Cyclic Behaviour. The dynamics described above are highly non-linear (small changes to the system’s state can result in large changes to its trajectory). Similar non-linear dynamics can emerge in multi- agent learning and lead to a variety of phenomena that do not occur in single-agent learning (Barfuss et al., 2019; Barfuss & Mann, 2022; Galla & Farmer, 2013; Leonardos et al., 2020; Nagarajan et al., 2020). One of the simplest examples of this phenomenon is Q-learning (Watkins & Dayan, 1992): in the case of a single agent, convergence to an optimal policy is guaranteed under modest condition

From Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI (Hammond2025), as extracted by the MIT AI Risk Repository (CC BY 4.0).

Classification

Domain: 7. AI system safety, failures, & limitations
Subdomain: 7.6 Multi-agent risks
Causal entity: AI
Intent: Unintentional
Timing: Post-deployment

Subdomain definition: Risks from multi-agent interactions, due to incentives (which can lead to conflict or collusion) and/or the structure of multi-agent systems, which can create cascading failures, selection pressures, new security vulnerabilities, and a lack of shared information and trust.

How other frameworks describe this risk

Groups of LLM-Agents May Show Emergent Functionality
Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models (Anwar2024)
Foundationality May Cause Correlated Failures
Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models (Anwar2024)
Multi-Agent Safety Is Not Assured by Single-Agent Safety
Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models (Anwar2024)
Collusion between LLM-Agents
Foundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language Models (Anwar2024)
Financial instability due to model homogeneity
Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024)
Multi-agent collaboration capability
Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (Tse2025)
Impact on Financial Stability
Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (Tse2025)
Multi-agent collusion propensity:
Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (Tse2025)

Other entries from Hammond2025

Miscoordination Risk Category · 7.6
Miscoordination Additional evidence
Incompatible strategies Risk Sub-Category · 7.6
Incompatible strategies Additional evidence
Credit Assignment Risk Sub-Category · 7.6
Limited Interactions Risk Sub-Category · 7.6
Conflict Risk Category · 7.6
Conflict Additional evidence
Conflict Additional evidence
Social Dilemmas Risk Sub-Category · 7.6
Military Domains Risk Sub-Category · 7.6
Coercion and Extortion Risk Sub-Category · 7.6