AIPolicyTracker
Legal requirement Governance and accountability European Union Partially applicable

Non-EU providers of GPAI models must appoint an EU authorised representative

Context fileUnder EU AI Act, Article 54

Source-linked Open official source

What does it require?

Before placing a general-purpose AI model on the Union market, a provider established in a third country must appoint, by written mandate, an authorised representative established in the Union. The representative checks that the Annex XI documentation exists and the Article 53 duties are met, keeps a copy of the documentation and the provider's contact details for ten years after market placement, provides information to the AI Office on request, cooperates with authorities, and must end the mandate if the provider breaches the Regulation. Open-source models without systemic risk are exempt.

Practical action

Appoint an EU representative under a written mandate covering document retention and AI Office liaison before the model reaches EU users.

Who does it apply to?

Providers of general-purpose AI models established outside the EU, unless the model is free and open-source and not of systemic risk.

Applies from:

Which controls meet this duty?

Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.

  • satisfiesContractual termLegal counsel · once per ai system
    Contractual allocation of AI duties across the supply chain

    Serves 8 recorded duties · evidence: AI supplier clause set, AI customer or deployer clause set, Contract clause index against the AI register

    The mandate and its task list.

  • supportsProcessProduct or model owner · at launch and on material change
    Technical documentation, model cards and instructions for use

    Serves 13 recorded duties · evidence: Technical documentation file, Model card or deployer information pack, Instructions for use

    The documentation the representative holds.

What evidence would a reviewer expect?

Evidence examples
EvidenceTypeNotes
Written mandate of authorised representative for GPAIdocument
Representative's verification of Annex XI documentationrecord

Framework mappings

Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.

See every European Union duty mapped this way →

Framework mappings
FrameworkReferenceNoteConfidence
ISO/IEC 42001:2023Clause 5.3; Annex A.10.2Responsibilities allocated to an external party.medium
NIST AI RMF 1.0GOVERN 2.1, GOVERN 6.1Roles and third-party arrangements.low

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Non-EU providers of GPAI models must appoint an EU authorised representative (EU AI Act)”. https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/eu-ai-act-art-54-gpai-authorised-representative (accessed 24 September 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Cite the official text alongside it: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence, Official Journal of the European Union, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.

Similar obligations in other instruments

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.