Verification
How current every record is
Every published record carries the date its facts were last confirmed against the official source. This page sets the maximum age for each kind of record, counts how many are past it, and names the longest overdue. The same check runs on every change to the data, so the corpus cannot go stale without someone deciding to allow it.
985
172
172
Pass
Maximum age by record type
A record is governed by the first rule it matches. Rules marked critical fail the data check when breaches exceed the budget.
| Record type | Owner | Max age | Critical | Records | Overdue | Never checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binding instruments in force | Editor | 90 days | Yes | 57 | 28 | 28 |
| Binding instruments adopted but not yet applying | Editor | 180 days | Yes | 23 | 12 | 12 |
| Obligations | Editor | 180 days | Yes | 107 | 58 | 58 |
| Obligations of instruments no longer in force | Editor | 365 days | No | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Guidance, strategies and standards | Editor | 365 days | No | 164 | 20 | 20 |
| Change log entries | Editor | 365 days | No | 375 | 6 | 6 |
| Jurisdiction profiles | Editor | 365 days | No | 249 | 38 | 38 |
Longest overdue
The 40 records most in need of a check. Opening one shows its status and official source; anyone can report a correction.
- Abu Dhabi Government Digital Strategy 2025-2027
- DIFC Regulation 10 (AI and personal data)
- Dubai Universal Blueprint for AI
- Buenos Aires Province AI framework decree
- ACT Government AI policy
- NSW AI Assessment Framework
- NSW AI Operational Policy
- NSW digital work systems act 2026
- Queensland AI governance policy
- South Australia AI ethics policy
- Victoria public sector generative AI guideline
- Western Australia AI policy and assurance framework
- Flanders AI policy plan
- Goiás state AI law (LC 205/2025)
- Paraná AI in public administration law
- Alberta government AI usage policy
- British Columbia public service generative AI policy
- Northern Ireland draft AI strategy
- Beijing general AI measures (2023)
- EU AI Act
- Shanghai AI regulations (2022)
- Shenzhen AI industry regulations (2022)
- Schleswig-Holstein AI in administration act (ITEG)
- Catalonia AI Strategy 2030
- Extremadura AI decree-law 2/2023
- Galicia AI law (Law 2/2025)
- Hong Kong Ethical AI Framework
- Maharashtra AI Policy 2026
- Odisha AI Policy 2025
- Tamil Nadu Safe and Ethical AI Policy 2020
- Telangana AI framework
- Calabria AI law (Regional Law 4/2026)
- Tuscany AI law (2026)
- Tokyo government AI guideline (2026)
- Seoul AI literacy ordinance
- Scotland's AI Strategy 2026-2031
- Singapore AI Tester Accreditation Programme
- Singapore agentic AI governance framework
- Singapore starter kit for testing agentic AI
- Singapore starter kit for testing LLM applications
How a record becomes verified
A reviewer opens the official source, confirms each dated claim against it, and records the check with their name and the date. Re-import of the underlying data never clears that decision. Until a record has been through that, it is shown as pending review and its confidence level is published alongside it. Read the methodology for the full standard.
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.