Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

Reviewers

Who checks the records, and what they have declared

A record is marked verified only when a named person has opened the official source and confirmed each claim against it. This page names those people, publishes the interests each of them has declared, and shows how many records each has actually verified.

Nobody appears here without a declaration of interest. The roster lives in the public repository, so every declaration and every later change to one arrives through a pull request with a date and a diff, and a record cannot claim to be verified by a name that is not on this page: the data check rejects it.

985

Published records

764

Verified by a named reviewer

1

Reviewers on the roster

180

Verified by an unlisted name

Of those, 868 can carry a reviewer's name. Obligations cannot: they record a review status and a date but no reviewer, because an obligation's verification belongs to the instrument it was read out of.

The roster

Bhaskar Bhatt

Editor · since Sep 2026

584 records verified

Founder and maintainer of AIPolicyTracker. Builds and reviews the source-backed records behind the platform, working from official journals, regulator and ministry publications across the covered jurisdictions.

Expertise: AI governance, AI regulation and policy, Compliance and assurance

Declared interests

  • Founder of AIPolicyTracker and associated with Certifyi AI, a commercial AI-governance compliance platform. A record on this site can therefore be read as supporting a related commercial interest. Mitigation: Verifications are recorded against the official source only, and the record itself links that source so any reader can check it. This platform names no vendor or product in its records, and the relationship is disclosed on the About page and here. Declared 22 Sep 2026

Email · Editorial desk · Public profile · GitHub

What a reviewer does, and what constrains them

  • Opens the record's official source and confirms each dated claim against it, then records the check with their name and the date. Re-importing the underlying data never clears that decision.
  • Declares anything that could bear on their judgement before verifying anything. "None declared." is a declaration; saying nothing is not, and fails the build.
  • Cannot sign a verification anonymously: the data check rejects a record whose reviewed_by is not a published reviewer.
  • Is measured by what they verified, not by what they are listed as covering. The counts above come from the records, not from the roster file.

How often each record type must be re-checked is set by the verification policy; what a record must carry at all is set by the completeness policy; what readers reported and what was decided is in the corrections log.

Volunteer as a reviewer

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.