AIPolicyTracker

AI incident ·

Remotely Operated Taser-Armed Drones Proposed by Taser Manufacturer as Defense for School Shootings in the US

1 news report Snapshot 7 Sep 2026

In brief

An AI system built by Axon Enterprise and deployed by None allegedly harmed Schools, Educational Communities and 1 other.

Risk domain
Socioeconomic & Environmental Harms Governance failure
Occurred
Coverage
1 reportJun 2022

What happened

Axon Enterprise considered development of remotely operated drones capable of tasering at a target a short distance away as a defense mechanism for mass shootings, despite its internal AI ethics board’s previous objection and condemnation as dangerous and fantastical.

Laws that address this harm

Policy angle: Classified under Socioeconomic & Environmental Harms (Governance failure) in the MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy; 5 recorded instruments address this use case.

Matched from the record's risk domain and country to the instruments recorded here. A reviewer can correct the match in the repository (data/external/incident_overrides.yaml).

News reports (1)

Titles link to the original publisher; report text is not reproduced here.

Who was involved

Alleged deployer
None
Alleged developer
Axon Enterprise
Alleged harmed party
Schools, Educational Communities, Students

Classification (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy)

Causal entity
Human
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Pre-deployment
Harm level
—
Sectors
—
Countries
—

Risk entries describing this failure mode

Entries from the MIT AI Risk Repository coded to subdomain 6.5.

  • Liability issues in case of accidents

    "Despite the promise of streamlined travel, AI also brings concerns about who is liable in case of accidents and which ethical principles autonomous transportation agents should follow when making decisions with a potent...

    The Rise of Artificial Intelligence - Future Outlooks and Emerging Risks (Allianz2018)

  • Mobility

    "Despite the promise of streamlined travel, AI also brings concerns about who is liable in case of accidents and which ethical principles autonomous transportation agents should follow when making decisions with a potent...

    The Rise of Artificial Intelligence - Future Outlooks and Emerging Risks (Allianz2018)

  • Faster scientific progress makes it harder for governance to keep pace with development

    "Exacerbating these problems is that faster scientific progress would make it even harder for governance to keep pace with the deployment of new technologies. When these technologies are especially powerful or dangerous,...

    A Survey of the Potential Long-term Impacts of AI: How AI Could Lead to Long-term Changes in Science, Cooperation, Power, Epistemics and Values (Clarke2023)

  • Type 1: Diffusion of responsibility

    Societal-scale harm can arise from AI built by a diffuse collection of creators, where no one is uniquely accountable for the technology's creation or use, as in a classic "tragedy of the commons".

    TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  • Products Liability Law

    "Like manufactured items like soda bottles, mechanized lawnmowers, pharmaceuticals, or cosmetic products, generative AI models can be viewed like a new form of digital products developed by tech companies and deployed wi...

    Generating Harms - Generative AI's impact and paths forwards (EPIC2023)

  • Difficult to develop metrics for evaluating benefits or harms caused by AI assistants

    "Another difficulty facing AI assistant systems is that it is challenging to develop metrics for evaluating particular aspects of benefits or harms caused by the assistant – especially in a sufficiently expansive sense,...

    The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants (Gabriel2024)

  • Institutional responsibilities

    "Efforts to deploy advanced assistant technology in society, in a way that is broadly beneficial, can be viewed as a wicked problem (Rittel and Webber, 1973). Wicked problems are defined by the property that they do not...

    The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants (Gabriel2024)

  • General Evaluations (Limited coverage of capabilities evaluations)

    "GPAI model developers might run capabilities evaluations to determine whether it has dangerous or dual-use capabilities, and then decide whether it is safe to deploy. Such capabilities evaluations can fail to demonstrat...

    Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024)

Incidents in the same risk subdomain

All incidents in this subdomain

Other incidents involving None

Source record: incident #252 on the AI Incident Database · all 1 report