AIPolicyTracker

AI policy updates

AI policy updates

Summary

The most recent entries: 10 AI policy changes recorded across 8 jurisdictions, of which 2 instruments entered into force, 3 concerned binding law, 3 were rated urgent or high impact. Each is dated, links to its official source, and shows what it means in practice.

Changes
10
Jurisdictions
8
Entered into force
2
Urgent or high impact
3

Last updated · most recent change 6 Aug 2026

Reset

Latest changes (144)

United States Routine Proposed

House members introduce the AI Tax and Work Protection Act (H.R. 10044), an excise tax on AI tokens

H.R. 10044 would tax large AI companies on the value of the tokens their models process or on AI-service revenue, whichever is higher, with a rate that rises automatically as unemployment climbs, and would create a Work Protection Administration in the Department of Labor to fund jobs. Introduced by Representatives Sara Jacobs, Greg Casar and Valerie Foushee. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm on Congress.gov.

Practical impact: No obligations; a proposal to watch in the economic-transition tracker.

H.R. 10044, AI Tax and Work Protection Act Source-linked (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
European Union High Partially applicable

EU AI Act general application begins; Article 50 transparency duties now apply

The general application date in Article 113 arrived. Chatbot disclosure, synthetic-content marking and deepfake labelling under Article 50 now apply; the high-risk obligations do not, having been deferred by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm against the Official Journal text.

Practical impact: Label AI interactions and synthetic content now; high-risk conformity work runs to the deferred dates.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, Article 113 as amended Source-linked (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
European Union Urgent Partially applicable

EU Digital Omnibus on AI enters into force, moving high-risk AI Act duties to December 2027 and August 2028

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, published in the Official Journal on 24 July 2026, entered into force on 27 July 2026. It amends Article 113 of the AI Act so that the Chapter III high-risk obligations apply from 2 December 2027 for stand-alone Annex III systems and from 2 August 2028 for AI embedded in Annex I products, adds two Article 5 prohibitions applying from 2 December 2026, and leaves the 2 August 2026 general application and Article 50 transparency dates in place. Recorded from concordant secondary reporting; confirm against the Official Journal text.

Practical impact: Re-plan high-risk conformity work to the December 2027 and August 2028 dates; transparency duties under Article 50 still applied from 2 August 2026.

EU AI Act Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI) Source-linked (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Japan Routine

Second AI Basic Plan adopted by Cabinet decision

Milestone recorded for Artificial Intelligence Basic Plan (Japan): Second AI Basic Plan adopted by Cabinet decision. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Artificial Intelligence Basic Plan Second AI Basic Plan adopted by Cabinet decision Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Malaysia Routine

Ministry of Digital begins engagement and public consultation on the AI Governance Bill

Milestone recorded for Artificial Intelligence (Malaysia): Ministry of Digital begins engagement and public consultation on the AI Governance Bill. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Artificial Intelligence Ministry of Digital begins engagement and public consultation on the AI Governance Bill Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
United States Routine Proposed

Senator Sanders introduces the American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act (S. 4825)

S. 4825 would levy a one-time tax, payable in equity, on AI companies with more than USD 200 million in annual sales, placing the shares in a public fund managed by an independent commission and paying dividends to residents. Introduced and referred; no committee action recorded. Recorded from secondary reporting and the sponsor's press release; confirm on Congress.gov.

Practical impact: No obligations; a proposal to watch in the economic-transition tracker.

S. 4825, American A.I. Sovereign Wealth Fund Act Source-linked (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
South Africa Routine

Withdrawal gazetted (Notice 3978 of 2026, Gazette No. 54840)

Milestone recorded for Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (South Africa): Withdrawal gazetted (Notice 3978 of 2026, Gazette No. 54840). Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence Withdrawal gazetted (Notice 3978 of 2026, Gazette No. 54840) Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Singapore Routine

Update to the National AI Strategy released with 10 refreshed priorities

Milestone recorded for National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2.0 (Singapore): Update to the National AI Strategy released with 10 refreshed priorities. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

National Artificial Intelligence Strategy 2.0 Update to the National AI Strategy released with 10 refreshed priorities Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Colorado (United States) Urgent Adopted

Colorado repeals and replaces its AI Act with SB 26-189, effective 1 January 2027

The Governor signed SB 26-189, which repeals and re-enacts the Colorado AI Act (SB 24-205) before its delayed 30 June 2026 effective date. The replacement law narrows the scope to automated decision-making technology that materially influences consequential decisions, drops the duty of care, impact assessments, the risk-management programme and Attorney General notification, and adds advance notice, adverse-decision disclosure, meaningful human review, three-year record keeping and developer documentation duties. Recorded from secondary reporting; confirm against the enrolled bill.

Practical impact: Stop building to the SB 24-205 impact-assessment and risk-programme requirements; plan notice, adverse-decision disclosure, human review, record keeping and developer documentation for consequential decisions from 1 January 2027.

Colorado ADMT law (SB 26-189) SB26-189 Automated Decision-Making Technology Source-linked (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Indonesia Routine

Government completes inter-ministerial finalisation of the roadmap and ethics draft regulations

Milestone recorded for Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 (Indonesia): Government completes inter-ministerial finalisation of the roadmap and ethics draft regulations. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 Government completes inter-ministerial finalisation of the roadmap and ethics draft regulations Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
South Africa Routine

Minister Malatsi announces withdrawal of the draft policy

Milestone recorded for Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence (South Africa): Minister Malatsi announces withdrawal of the draft policy. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Draft South Africa National Artificial Intelligence Minister Malatsi announces withdrawal of the draft policy Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Ghana Routine

Official launch in Accra; Minister's opening remarks published

Milestone recorded for Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy (Ghana): Official launch in Accra; Minister's opening remarks published. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Ghana National Artificial Intelligence Strategy Official launch in Accra; Minister's opening remarks published Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Mexico Routine

Plan Nacional de IA presented by ATDT (April 2026)

Milestone recorded for Plan Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (Mexico): Plan Nacional de IA presented by ATDT (April 2026). Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Plan Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial Plan Nacional de IA presented by ATDT (April 2026) Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Japan Routine

Ver1.2 published

Milestone recorded for AI Guidelines for Business (Japan): Ver1.2 published. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

AI Guidelines for Business Ver1.2 published Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Vietnam Routine

Law on Artificial Intelligence enters into force

Milestone recorded for Law on Artificial Intelligence (Vietnam): Law on Artificial Intelligence enters into force. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Law on Artificial Intelligence Law on Artificial Intelligence enters into force Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Indonesia Routine

Inter-ministerial plenary discusses draft Perpres on National AI Roadmap 2026-2029

Milestone recorded for Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 (Indonesia): Inter-ministerial plenary discusses draft Perpres on National AI Roadmap 2026-2029. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Rancangan Peraturan Presiden tentang Peta Jalan Kecerdasan Artifisial Nasional 2026-2029 Inter-ministerial plenary discusses draft Perpres on National AI Roadmap 2026-2029 Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Bangladesh Routine

Draft V2.0 published; consultation closed 8 February 2026

Milestone recorded for National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2026-2030 (Bangladesh): Draft V2.0 published; consultation closed 8 February 2026. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2026-2030 Draft V2.0 published; consultation closed 8 February 2026 Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Bangladesh Routine

Draft V1.1 released for public consultation

Milestone recorded for National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2026-2030 (Bangladesh): Draft V1.1 released for public consultation. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

National Artificial Intelligence Policy 2026-2030 Draft V1.1 released for public consultation Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
South Korea Routine

Act enters into force

Milestone recorded for Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust (South Korea): Act enters into force. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust Act enters into force Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Ontario (Canada) Routine In force

Ontario job postings must disclose AI screening

The Working for Workers Four Act provisions took effect requiring employers with 25 or more employees to state in public job postings whether AI is used to screen, assess or select applicants.

Practical impact: Add an AI-use statement to every public job posting for Ontario roles.

Ontario Working for Workers Four Act (AI disclosure in job postings) Bill 149 Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Illinois (United States) High In force

Illinois AI-in-employment provisions take effect

Public Act 103-0804 became effective: discriminatory AI use in employment decisions is a civil-rights violation and employers must notify employees of AI use.

Practical impact: Employers must have notices and bias testing in place for AI tools affecting Illinois workers.

Illinois HB 3773 (AI in employment, Human Rights Act amendment) HB 3773 / Public Act 103-0804 Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Texas (United States) High In force

Texas TRAIGA takes effect

The Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act became effective, with Attorney General enforcement after a 60-day cure period.

Practical impact: Prohibited-intent screening, government disclosure and sandbox applications are now live requirements in Texas.

Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (TRAIGA) HB 149 (89R) Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Egypt Routine

NCAI mandate expanded to AI, Quantum Computing and Emerging Technologies (January 2026)

Milestone recorded for National AI Strategy (Egypt): NCAI mandate expanded to AI, Quantum Computing and Emerging Technologies (January 2026). Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

National AI Strategy NCAI mandate expanded to AI, Quantum Computing and Emerging Technologies (January 2026) Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
California (United States) High In force

California SB 53 frontier-model transparency duties become operative

Most provisions of the Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act took effect, including the duty to publish a frontier AI framework and report critical safety incidents.

Practical impact: Large frontier developers should now have a published framework and incident-reporting process.

California SB 53 SB 53 Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Japan Routine

First AI Basic Plan adopted by Cabinet decision

Milestone recorded for Artificial Intelligence Basic Plan (Japan): First AI Basic Plan adopted by Cabinet decision. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Artificial Intelligence Basic Plan First AI Basic Plan adopted by Cabinet decision Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
New York (United States) High Adopted

New York signs the RAISE Act on frontier-model safety

The Governor signed the Responsible AI Safety and Education Act with agreed amendments aligning it to California SB 53, requiring large frontier developers to publish safety protocols and report critical incidents, reportedly effective 1 January 2027.

Practical impact: Frontier-model developers serving New York should align safety documentation with California SB 53 to satisfy both laws; verify the enrolled chapter text.

New York RAISE Act (frontier model safety) S6953-B Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Vietnam Routine

Law No. 134/2025/QH15 passed by the National Assembly

Milestone recorded for Law on Artificial Intelligence (Vietnam): Law No. 134/2025/QH15 passed by the National Assembly. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

Law on Artificial Intelligence Law No. 134/2025/QH15 passed by the National Assembly Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Vietnam Routine

National Assembly passes the Law on Artificial Intelligence, creating a binding framework

Milestone recorded for National Strategy on Research, Development and Application of Artificial Intelligence to 2030 (Vietnam): National Assembly passes the Law on Artificial Intelligence, creating a binding framework. Recorded from the official source listed; details to be expanded by a reviewer.

National Strategy on Research, Development and Application of Artificial Intelligence to 2030 National Assembly passes the Law on Artificial Intelligence, creating a binding framework Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
Australia High Under consultation

Australia releases a National AI Plan signalling an existing-law approach

The National AI Plan set out the government's AI agenda and indicated that AI would be governed by strengthening existing laws rather than a standalone AI Act. The status of the 2024 mandatory-guardrails proposal must be confirmed.

Practical impact: Australian organisations should not expect a cross-economy AI Act in the near term; existing-law compliance and the voluntary standard remain the baseline.

Australian mandatory guardrails proposal National AI Plan Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)
European Union High Partially applicable

European Commission proposes Digital Omnibus adjustments to AI Act timelines

The Commission proposed a "Digital Omnibus" package that would, among other changes, link the application of certain high-risk obligations to the availability of standards and support tools, with later backstop dates. This is a proposal and requires adoption by the European Parliament and Council.

Practical impact: High-risk timelines may move; organisations should keep planning against Article 113 dates until an amendment is adopted.

EU AI Act AI Act policy page (Digital Omnibus proposal) Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 · reviewed by AI Policy Tracker (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice)

Frequently asked questions

When was this page last updated?
The most recent change on record occurred on 6 August 2026. The page is generated from the records, so it changes the moment a new entry is logged; the "Last updated" time above is the last edit to any record shown.
Where do these updates come from?
Every entry is written from an official source — a journal, a regulator, a legislature — and links to it. Nothing here is a press summary of a press summary. Entries record what changed, the status after the change and what it means in practice.
How is "top story" decided?
By a published rule, not an editor's mood: impact level, whether the instrument is binding, whether it entered into force, whether a named reviewer confirmed the record, and how recent it is, added up and shown as a score out of 100.
Can I follow updates for one country?
Yes. Every jurisdiction with recorded changes has its own updates page and RSS feed, and the weekly digest can be limited to the jurisdictions you choose.

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.

Frequently asked questions

When was this page last updated?
The most recent change on record occurred on 6 August 2026. The page is generated from the records, so it changes the moment a new entry is logged; the "Last updated" time above is the last edit to any record shown.
Where do these updates come from?
Every entry is written from an official source — a journal, a regulator, a legislature — and links to it. Nothing here is a press summary of a press summary. Entries record what changed, the status after the change and what it means in practice.
How is "top story" decided?
By a published rule, not an editor's mood: impact level, whether the instrument is binding, whether it entered into force, whether a named reviewer confirmed the record, and how recent it is, added up and shown as a score out of 100.
Can I follow updates for one country?
Yes. Every jurisdiction with recorded changes has its own updates page and RSS feed, and the weekly digest can be limited to the jurisdictions you choose.