AIPolicyTracker

AI incident ·

Security Robot Drowns Itself in a Fountain

29 news reports Snapshot 7 Sep 2026

In brief

An AI system built and deployed by Knightscope allegedly harmed Knightscope.

Risk domain
AI system safety, failures, and limitations Lack of capability or robustness
Occurred
Coverage
29 reportsJul 2017 - Mar 2018

What happened

A Knightscope K5 security robot ran itself into a water fountain in Washington, DC.

Laws that address this harm

Policy angle: Classified under AI system safety, failures, and limitations (Lack of capability or robustness) in the MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy; 5 recorded instruments address this use case in the United States.

Matched from the record's risk domain and country to the instruments recorded here. A reviewer can correct the match in the repository (data/external/incident_overrides.yaml).

News reports (29)

Titles link to the original publisher; report text is not reproduced here.

  1. DC security robot K5 quits job by drowning itself in a fountain
    cnbc.com · Natt Garun, Michael Nagle, Bloomberg
  2. A Robot Security Guard Just Drowned Itself by Driving into a Water Fountain
    interestingengineering.com · Jessica Miley, Loukia Papadopoulos, Taylor Donovan Barnett
  3. Robot Security Guard 'Drowns Itself' In Water Fountain
    huffingtonpost.com.au · Lara Pearce
  4. Security robot drowns in a fountain
    usatoday.com · Ashley May
  5. Robot Drowns Itself In Washington D.C. Pool
    knowyourmeme.com · Adam Downer

Who was involved

Alleged deployer
Knightscope
Alleged developer
Knightscope
Alleged harmed party
Knightscope

Classification (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy)

Causal entity
AI
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm level
AI tangible harm event
Sectors
administrative and support service activities
Countries
US

Risk entries describing this failure mode

Entries from the MIT AI Risk Repository coded to subdomain 7.3.

  • Reliability issues

    "Relying on general-purpose AI products that fail to fulfil their intended function can lead to harm. For example, general- purpose AI systems can make up facts (‘hallucination’), generate erroneous computer code, or pro...

    International AI Safety Report 2025 (Bengio2025)

  • Type 2: Bigger than expected

    Harm can result from AI that was not expected to have a large impact at all, such as a lab leak, a surprisingly addictive open-source product, or an unexpected repurposing of a research prototype.

    TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  • Type 3: Worse than expected

    AI intended to have a large societal impact can turn out harmful by mistake, such as a popular product that creates problems and partially solves them only for its users.

    TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  • Ethics and Morality Issues

    LMs need to pay more attention to universally accepted societal values at the level of ethics and morality, including the judgement of right and wrong, and its relationship with social norms and laws.

    Towards Safer Generative Language Models: A Survey on Safety Risks, Evaluations, and Improvements (Deng2023)

  • Safe learning

    "AGIs should avoid making fatal mistakes during the learning phase. Subproblems include safe exploration and distributional shift (DeepMind, OpenAI), and continual learning (Berkeley)."

    AGI Safety Literature Review (Everitt2018 )

  • Malign belief distributions

    "Christiano (2016) argues that the universal distribution M (Hutter, 2005; Solomonoff, 1964a,b, 1978) is malign. The argument is somewhat intricate, and is based on the idea that a hypothesis about the world often includ...

    AGI Safety Literature Review (Everitt2018 )

  • Meta-cognition

    "Agents that reason about their own computational resources and logically uncertain events can encounter strange paradoxes due to Godelian limitations (Fallenstein and Soares, 2015; Soares and Fallenstein, 2014, 2017) an...

    AGI Safety Literature Review (Everitt2018 )

  • Technical and operational risks

    "To date, technical limitations and vulnerabilities are present in most generative AI models in various contexts. Consequently, malicious users find it easier to breach an AI system’s safety and ethical guardrails to e...

    Regulating under Uncertainty: Governance Options for Generative AI (G'sell2024)

Incidents in the same risk subdomain

All incidents in this subdomain

Other incidents involving Knightscope

Source record: incident #68 on the AI Incident Database · all 29 reports