AIPolicyTracker

AI incident ·

The New York Times Sued Perplexity for Allegedly Using Copyrighted Content and Generating False Attributions

6 news reports Snapshot 7 Sep 2026

In brief

An AI system built and deployed by Perplexity Ai allegedly harmed Writers, The New York Times and 3 others.

Risk domain
Socioeconomic & Environmental Harms Economic and cultural devaluation of human effort
Occurred
Coverage
6 reportsDec 2025

What happened

On December 5, 2025, The New York Times sued Perplexity, alleging the company used copyrighted Times articles without permission to train its AI system and generated outputs that reproduced Times content or falsely attributed fabricated information to the newspaper. The suit claims the conduct harmed the Times's business and brand. Perplexity denies wrongdoing.

Laws that address this harm

Policy angle: Classified under Socioeconomic & Environmental Harms (Economic and cultural devaluation of human effort) in the MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy; 5 recorded instruments address this use case.

Matched from the record's risk domain and country to the instruments recorded here. A reviewer can correct the match in the repository (data/external/incident_overrides.yaml).

News reports (3)

Titles link to the original publisher; report text is not reproduced here.

  1. The New York Times v. Perplexity AI: New Frontiers in IP and AI
    jdsupra.com · Ran Karmi, Avishay Klein, Barnea Jaffa Lande & Co.

Who was involved

Alleged deployer
Perplexity Ai
Alleged developer
Perplexity Ai
Alleged harmed party
Writers, The New York Times, Publishers, Journalistic Integrity, Epistemic Integrity

Classification (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy)

Causal entity
AI
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm level
—
Sectors
—
Countries
—

Risk entries describing this failure mode

Entries from the MIT AI Risk Repository coded to subdomain 6.3.

  • Cultural dispossession

    "Cultural dispossession - Intentional and/or unintentional erasure of cultural goods and values, such as ways of speaking, expressing humour, or sounds and voices that contribute to a cultural identity, or their inapprop...

    A Collaborative, Human-Centred Taxonomy of AI, Algorithmic, and Automation Harms (Abercrombie2024)

  • Loss of creativity/critical thinking

    "Loss of creativity/critical thinking - Devaluation and/or deterioration of human creativity, artistic ex- pression, imagination, critical thinking or problem-solving skills."

    A Collaborative, Human-Centred Taxonomy of AI, Algorithmic, and Automation Harms (Abercrombie2024)

  • Copyright infringement

    "The use of large amounts of copyrighted data for training general- purpose AI models poses a challenge to traditional intellectual property laws, and to systems of consent, compensation, and control over data. The use o...

    International Scientific Report on the Safety of Advanced AI (Bengio2024)

  • Risks of copyright infringement

    "The use of vast amounts of data for training general- purpose AI models has caused concerns related to data rights and intellectual property. Data collection and content generation can implicate a variety of data rights...

    International AI Safety Report 2025 (Bengio2025)

  • Copyright Violation

    "LLM systems may output content similar to existing works, infringing on copyright owners."

    Risk Taxonomy, Mitigation, and Assessment Benchmarks of Large Language Model Systems (Cui2024)

  • Intellectual property rights violations

    "This is an emerging category, with more cases prone to appear as the use of generative AI tools–such as Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, or ChatGPT–becomes more widespread. Some content creators are already suing for the a...

    Navigating the Landscape of AI Ethics and Responsibility (Cunha2023)

  • Impact on Intellectual Property Rights

    "The extent and effectiveness of legal protections for intellectual property have been thrown into question with the rise of generative AI. Generative AI trains itself on vast pools of data that often include IP-protecte...

    Generating Harms - Generative AI's impact and paths forwards (EPIC2023)

  • Copyright challenges (copyright-infringing output)

    "Even though models generally create new outputs, it is possible that the content produced by a generative AI tool—such as an image, or even computer code— could turn out to be almost identical to that used in the traini...

    Regulating under Uncertainty: Governance Options for Generative AI (G'sell2024)

Incidents in the same risk subdomain

All incidents in this subdomain

Other incidents involving Perplexity Ai

Source record: incident #1294 on the AI Incident Database · all 6 reports