MIT AI Risk Repository · Additional evidence · 47.02.14.c

Nascent capabilities (agency and autonomy)

Category: Ethical and social risks

Open the MIT Risk Navigator All entries from G'sell2024

On this page 3 sections

Description

Example: "Intentional harms, by contrast, could result from users exploiting connectivity and agency for malicious purposes. For example, connecting a generative AI model to a web browser or email server could enable malicious users to ask the model to write code for novel malware or instruct the LLM to distribute malware via the internet."

From Regulating under Uncertainty: Governance Options for Generative AI (G'sell2024), as extracted by the MIT AI Risk Repository (CC BY 4.0).

Classification

Domain: —
Subdomain: —
Causal entity: —
Intent: —
Timing: —

Other entries from G'sell2024

Technical and operational risks Risk Category · 7.3
Technical vulnerabilities (Robustness - unexpected behaviour) Risk Sub-Category · 7.3
Technical vulnerabilities (Robustness - unexpected behaviour) Additional evidence
Technical vulnerabilities (Robustness - vulnerability to jailbreaking Risk Sub-Category · 2.2
Technical vulnerabilities (Robustness - vulnerability to jailbreaking Additional evidence
Technical vulnerabilities (The risk of misalignment) Risk Sub-Category · 7.1
Technical vulnerabilities (The risk of misalignment) Additional evidence
Factually incorrect content (inaccuracies and fabricated sources) Risk Sub-Category · 3.1
Factually incorrect content (inaccuracies and fabricated sources) Additional evidence
Opacity (the black box problem) Risk Sub-Category · 7.4
Opacity (industry opacity) Risk Sub-Category · 6.4
Opacity (industry opacity) Additional evidence