Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

7 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

Export CSVExport JSON
Reset Also filtered by framework Li2025 ×

7 entries

  1. 66.03.00 · Risk Category

    Misinformation Harms

    -

    "AI systems generating and facilitating the spread of inaccurate or misleading information that causes people to develop false beliefs"

    From A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

  2. 66.03.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Misinformation Harms

    Propagating misconceptions / false beliefs

    "Generating or spreading false, low-quality, misleading, or inaccurate information that causes people to develop false or inaccurate perceptions and beliefs"

    From A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

  3. 66.09.06 · Risk Sub-Category

    Privacy and Security

    Distortion

    "disseminating false or misleading information about people"

    From A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

  4. 66.10.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Human Rights and Civil Liberties

    Erosion of due process

    "Restrictions to or loss of liberty as a result of use or misuse of a generative AI in a legal process"

    From A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

  5. 66.03.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Misinformation Harms

    Pollution of information ecosystems

    "Contaminating publicly available information with false or inaccurate information (i.e., the generative tool's output is disseminated beyond the end user)"

    From A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

  6. 66.03.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Misinformation Harms

    Erosion of trust in public information

  7. 66.04.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Societal and Cultural

    Overburdening ecosystems

    "Pollution of a space/ecosystem that is expected to be free of AI involvement/influence (e.g., creative material submission portals, job applications)"

    From A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Where do these risk entries come from?

The MIT AI Risk Repository, which extracts risks from dozens of published frameworks, taxonomies and papers and codes each one by domain and subdomain, and by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing. This is a browseable copy, attributed and openly licensed, not original research.

What do entity, intent and timing mean?

They are the causal coding. Entity is whether a human or the AI system is the cause; intent is whether the harm was intentional or not; timing is whether it arises before or after deployment. Together they let you separate misuse from malfunction.

Can I export the results?

Yes, any filtered set exports as CSV or JSON, and every export carries the upstream source, licence and citation with it, because attribution is a condition of the licence rather than a courtesy.

What is the MIT AI Risk Repository?

A living database of AI risks extracted from published frameworks, taxonomies and papers, classified by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing and by a domain taxonomy of seven domains and 24 subdomains. It is published by the MIT AI Risk Initiative under CC BY 4.0.