MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

126 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

126 entries · page 3 of 3

  1. 62.30.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Impacts of AI (Physical)

    Damage to critical infrastructure

    "The integration of AI systems within critical infrastructure, ranging from trans- portation to power systems, can cause substantial damage in cases of failure or malfunction. With the increasing number of Internet of Things (IoT) devices and interconnected cyber-physical systems, critical infrastructure becomes even more vulnerable [171, 174]."

    From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024)

  2. 62.30.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Impacts of AI (Physical)

    Critical infrastructure component failures when integrated with AI systems

    "When relying on GPAI in critical infrastructure, there may be common mode failures that begin with vulnerabilities or robustness issues in the underlying model architecture or training setup. These failures may happen accidentally (in edge-cases) or due to adversarial inputs to the AI systems [58]."

    From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024)

  3. 62.30.04 · Risk Sub-Category

    Impacts of AI (Physical)

    AI Systems interacting with brittle environments

    "Deployed AI systems can rely on physical sensors and data sources that may exhibit hardware drift and thus data distribution drift over time. This distribu- tion drift may affect system robustness and performance. This usually involves AI systems working in undigitized and physical environments."

    From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024)

  4. 62.32.04 · Risk Sub-Category

    Impacts of AI (Cyberattacks)

    Models generating code with security vulnerabilities

    "Models can generate code or coding suggestions that contain security vulner- abilities. This may occur across various LLM-based model families, including more advanced models with superior coding performance, where the tendency to produce insecure code is even more pronounced [26]."

    From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024)

  5. 62.34.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Impacts of AI (Bias)

    Homogenization or correlated failures in model derivatives

    "Homogenization refers to common methodologies and models used across down- stream GPAI systems, which may lead to uniform failures and amplification of biases [176, 30]. This risk arises when numerous downstream AI systems are built upon a few large-scale foundation models."

    From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024)

  6. 65.02.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Training Data Risks (Data laws)

    Data usage restrictions

    "Laws and other restrictions can limit or prohibit the use of some data for specific AI use cases."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  7. 65.02.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Training Data Risks (Data laws)

    Data acquisition restrictions

    "Laws and other regulations might limit the collection of certain types of data for specific AI use cases."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  8. 65.02.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Training Data Risks (Data laws)

    Data transfer restrictions

    "Laws and other restrictions can limit or prohibit transferring data."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  9. 65.06.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Training Data Risks (Accuracy)

    Data contamination

    "Data contamination occurs when incorrect data is used for training. For example, data that is not aligned with model’s purpose or data that is already set aside for other development tasks such as testing and evaluation."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  10. 65.06.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Training Data Risks (Accuracy)

    Unrepresentative data

    "Unrepresentative data occurs when the training or fine-tuning data is not sufficiently representative of the underlying population or does not measure the phenomenon of interest."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  11. 65.07.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Training Data Risks (Value alignment)

    Improper retraining

    "Using undesirable output (for example, inaccurate, inappropriate, and user content) for retraining purposes can result in unexpected model behavior."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  12. 65.07.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Training Data Risks (Value alignment)

    Improper data curation

    "Improper collection and preparation of training or tuning data includes data label errors and by using data with conflicting information or misinformation."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  13. 65.13.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Inference risks (Accuracy)

    Poor model accuracy

    "Poor model accuracy occurs when a model’s performance is insufficient to the task it was designed for. Low accuracy might occur if the model is not correctly engineered, or there are changes to the model’s expected inputs."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  14. 65.15.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Output risks (Value alignment)

    Incomplete advice

    "When a model provides advice without having enough information, resulting in possible harm if the advice is followed."

    From AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  15. 66.04.04 · Risk Sub-Category

    Societal and Cultural

    Productivity loss

    "End user's loss of productivity due to the underperfomance of a genAI application, including producing nonsensical or poor quality outputs, degrading its utility."

    From A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

  16. "The chatbot makes a deal, commitment, or other consequential action with its output that the deployer did not intend."

    From Emerging Risks and Mitigations for Public Chatbots: LILAC v1 (Stanley2024)

  17. "The chatbot gives guidance that ranges from simply unhelpful to harmful if acted on."

    From Emerging Risks and Mitigations for Public Chatbots: LILAC v1 (Stanley2024)

  18. 69.04.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Bad advice/failure to generate helpful content

    Unhelpful responses

  19. 69.04.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Bad advice/failure to generate helpful content

    Bad links and references

  20. 69.04.04 · Risk Sub-Category

    Bad advice/failure to generate helpful content

    Nonsensical content

  21. 70.01.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Physical Risks

    Accidental harm

    "Automation in sectors ranging from manufacturing to healthcare has and will increasingly put humans into close contact with EAI systems [7]. This interaction increases the risk of accidental physical harm. Though accidental harm has been a longstanding issue in industrial robotics, increased AI capabilities could exacerbate this risk; several recent reports document an increase in industrial injuries following the introduction of AI-controlled robots [66–68]."

    From Embodied AI: Emerging Risks and Opportunities for Policy Action (Perlo2025)

  22. 71.01.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Scientific Domain of Agents

    Radiological Risks

    "Radiological risks involve both immediate operational hazards, such as exposure incidents or containment failures during the automated handling of radioactive materials, and broader security concerns regarding the potential misuse of AI systems in nuclear research."

    From Risks of AI Scientists: Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy (Tang2025)

  23. 71.01.04 · Risk Sub-Category

    Scientific Domain of Agents

    Physical (Mechanical ) Risks

    "Physical (mechanical) risks are associated with robotics and automated systems, which could lead to equipment malfunctions or physical harm in laboratory settings."

    From Risks of AI Scientists: Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy (Tang2025)

  24. 72.03.00 · Risk Category

    Accident Risks

    "Risks arising from operational failures, model misjudgments, or improper human operation of AI systems deployed in safety-critical infrastructure, where single points of failure can trigger cascading catastrophic consequences."

    From Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (Tse2025)

  25. 72.03.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Accident Risks

    Nuclear Power Systems

    "General-purpose AI deployed for reactor monitoring, control system optimization, or emergency response coordination could misinterpret sensor data, fail to recognize critical safety conditions, or make erroneous control decisions during emergency scenarios. Given the catastrophic potential of nuclear accidents, even minor AI reasoning errors in safety-critical functions could lead to core meltdowns, radiation releases, or widespread contamination affecting hundreds of thousands of people across international borders."

    From Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (Tse2025)

  26. 72.03.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Accident Risks

    Other Critical Infrastructure Control Systems

    "General-purpose AI deployed in power grid management, water treatment facilities, telecommunications networks, or transportation coordination systems could misinterpret operational data, fail to anticipate cascading failure modes, or make control decisions that destabilize interconnected infrastructure networks. Infrastructure failures could result in widespread blackouts, contaminated water supplies, communications breakdowns, and the collapse of essential services supporting hundreds of thousands of people."

    From Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (Tse2025)

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.