MIT AI Risk Repository
Browse AI risks
2,500 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
22.03.00 · Risk Category
"An essential factor in preventing accidents and maintaining low levels of risk lies in the organizations responsible for these technologies."
-
22.03.00.a · Additional evidence
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
22.03.02 · Risk Sub-Category
Organizational Risks (Accidental)
Organizational Factors can Reduce the Chances of Catastrophe
"Some organizations successfully avoid catastrophes while operating complex and hazardous systems such as nuclear reactors, aircraft carriers, and air traffic control systems [92, 93]. These organizations recognize that focusing solely on the hazards of the technology involved is insufficient; consideration must also be given to organizational factors that can contribute to accidents, including human factors, organizational procedures, and structure. These are especially important in the case of AI, where the underlying technology is not highly reliable and remains poorly understood"
-
22.03.02.a · Additional evidence
Organizational Risks (Accidental)
Organizational Factors can Reduce the Chances of Catastrophe
—
-
22.04.00.a · Additional evidence
—
-
22.04.00.b · Additional evidence
—
-
22.04.00.c · Additional evidence
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
24.06.00.a · Additional evidence
—
-
24.06.00.b · Additional evidence
—
-
24.06.00.c · Additional evidence
—
Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.