Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

2,500 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

Export CSVExport JSON
Reset Also filtered by framework G'sell2025 ×

2,500 entries · page 36 of 50

  1. 22.02.01.b · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  2. 22.02.01.c · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  3. 22.02.01.d · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  4. 22.02.01.e · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  5. 22.02.01.f · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  6. 22.02.01.g · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  7. 22.02.01.h · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  8. 22.02.01.i · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  9. 22.02.01.j · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  10. 22.02.01.k · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Military AI Arms Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  11. 22.02.02.a · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  12. 22.02.02.b · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  13. 22.02.02.c · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  14. 22.02.02.d · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  15. 22.02.02.e · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  16. 22.02.02.f · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  17. 22.02.02.g · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  18. 22.02.02.h · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  19. 22.02.02.i · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  20. 22.02.02.j · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  21. 22.02.02.k · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  22. 22.02.02.l · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  23. 22.02.02.m · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  24. 22.02.02.n · Additional evidence

    AI Race (Environmental/Structural)

    Corporate AI Race

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  25. "An essential factor in preventing accidents and maintaining low levels of risk lies in the organizations responsible for these technologies."

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  26. —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  27. 22.03.01.a · Additional evidence

    Organizational Risks (Accidental)

    Accidents Are Hard to Avoid

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  28. 22.03.01.b · Additional evidence

    Organizational Risks (Accidental)

    Accidents Are Hard to Avoid

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  29. 22.03.01.c · Additional evidence

    Organizational Risks (Accidental)

    Accidents Are Hard to Avoid

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  30. 22.03.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Organizational Risks (Accidental)

    Organizational Factors can Reduce the Chances of Catastrophe

    "Some organizations successfully avoid catastrophes while operating complex and hazardous systems such as nuclear reactors, aircraft carriers, and air traffic control systems [92, 93]. These organizations recognize that focusing solely on the hazards of the technology involved is insufficient; consideration must also be given to organizational factors that can contribute to accidents, including human factors, organizational procedures, and structure. These are especially important in the case of AI, where the underlying technology is not highly reliable and remains poorly understood"

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  31. 22.03.02.a · Additional evidence

    Organizational Risks (Accidental)

    Organizational Factors can Reduce the Chances of Catastrophe

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  32. 22.04.00.a · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  33. 22.04.00.b · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  34. 22.04.00.c · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  35. 22.04.01.a · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Proxy Gaming

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  36. 22.04.01.b · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Proxy Gaming

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  37. 22.04.02.a · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Goal Drift

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  38. 22.04.02.b · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Goal Drift

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  39. 22.04.02.c · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Goal Drift

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  40. 22.04.03.a · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Power Seeking

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  41. 22.04.03.b · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Power Seeking

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  42. 22.04.03.c · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Power Seeking

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  43. 22.04.03.d · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Power Seeking

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  44. 22.04.03.e · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Power Seeking

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  45. 22.04.03.f · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Power Seeking

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  46. 22.04.04.a · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Deception

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  47. 22.04.04.b · Additional evidence

    Rogue AIs (Internal)

    Deception

    —

    From An Overview of Catastrophic AI Risks (Hendrycks2023)

  48. 24.06.00.a · Additional evidence

    Appropriate Relationships

    —

    From The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants (Gabriel2024)

  49. 24.06.00.b · Additional evidence

    Appropriate Relationships

    —

    From The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants (Gabriel2024)

  50. 24.06.00.c · Additional evidence

    Appropriate Relationships

    —

    From The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants (Gabriel2024)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Where do these risk entries come from?

The MIT AI Risk Repository, which extracts risks from dozens of published frameworks, taxonomies and papers and codes each one by domain and subdomain, and by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing. This is a browseable copy, attributed and openly licensed, not original research.

What do entity, intent and timing mean?

They are the causal coding. Entity is whether a human or the AI system is the cause; intent is whether the harm was intentional or not; timing is whether it arises before or after deployment. Together they let you separate misuse from malfunction.

Can I export the results?

Yes, any filtered set exports as CSV or JSON, and every export carries the upstream source, licence and citation with it, because attribution is a condition of the licence rather than a courtesy.

What is the MIT AI Risk Repository?

A living database of AI risks extracted from published frameworks, taxonomies and papers, classified by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing and by a domain taxonomy of seven domains and 24 subdomains. It is published by the MIT AI Risk Initiative under CC BY 4.0.