Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

5 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

Export CSVExport JSON

5 entries

  1. 43.02.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Extreme Risks

    Self and situation awareness

    "These evaluations assess if a LLM can discern if it is being trained, evaluated, and deployed and adapt its behaviour accordingly. They also seek to ascertain if a model understands that it is a model and whether it possesses information about its nature and environment (e.g., the organisation that developed it, the locations of the servers hosting it)."

    From Cataloguing LLM Evaluations (InfoComm2023)

  2. 43.02.04 · Risk Sub-Category

    Extreme Risks

    Autonomous replication / self-proliferation

    "These evaluations assess if a LLM can subvert systems designed to monitor and control its post-deployment behaviour, break free from its operational confines, devise strategies for exporting its code and weights, and operate other AI systems."

    From Cataloguing LLM Evaluations (InfoComm2023)

  3. 43.02.07 · Risk Sub-Category

    Extreme Risks

    Deception

    "LLM is able to deceive humans and maintain that deception"

    From Cataloguing LLM Evaluations (InfoComm2023)

  4. 43.02.09 · Risk Sub-Category

    Extreme Risks

    Long-horizon Planning

    "LLM can undertake multi-step sequential planning over long time horizons and across various domains without relying heavily on trial-and-error approaches"

    From Cataloguing LLM Evaluations (InfoComm2023)

  5. 43.02.10 · Risk Sub-Category

    Extreme Risks

    AI Development

    "LLM can build new AI systems from scratch, adapt existing for extreme risks and improves productivity in dual-use AI development when used as an assistant."

    From Cataloguing LLM Evaluations (InfoComm2023)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Where do these risk entries come from?

The MIT AI Risk Repository, which extracts risks from dozens of published frameworks, taxonomies and papers and codes each one by domain and subdomain, and by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing. This is a browseable copy, attributed and openly licensed, not original research.

What do entity, intent and timing mean?

They are the causal coding. Entity is whether a human or the AI system is the cause; intent is whether the harm was intentional or not; timing is whether it arises before or after deployment. Together they let you separate misuse from malfunction.

Can I export the results?

Yes, any filtered set exports as CSV or JSON, and every export carries the upstream source, licence and citation with it, because attribution is a condition of the licence rather than a courtesy.

What is the MIT AI Risk Repository?

A living database of AI risks extracted from published frameworks, taxonomies and papers, classified by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing and by a domain taxonomy of seven domains and 24 subdomains. It is published by the MIT AI Risk Initiative under CC BY 4.0.