Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

5 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

Export CSVExport JSON

5 entries

  1. 30.01.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Reliability

    Inconsistency

    models could fail to provide the same and consistent answers to different users, to the same user but in different sessions, and even in chats within the sessions of the same conversation

    From Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

  2. 30.05.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Explainability & Reasoning

    Limited Logical Reasoning

    LLMs can provide seemingly sensible but ultimately incorrect or invalid justifications when answering questions

    From Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

  3. 30.05.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Explainability & Reasoning

    Limited Causal Reasoning

    Causal reasoning makes inferences about the relationships between events or states of the world, mostly by identifying cause-effect relationships

    From Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

  4. 30.06.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Social Norm

    Unawareness of Emotions

    when a certain vulnerable group of users asks for supporting information, the answers should be informative but at the same time sympathetic and sensitive to users’ reactions

    From Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

  5. 30.07.00 · Risk Category

    Robustness

    Resilience against adversarial attacks and distribution shift

    From Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Where do these risk entries come from?

The MIT AI Risk Repository, which extracts risks from dozens of published frameworks, taxonomies and papers and codes each one by domain and subdomain, and by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing. This is a browseable copy, attributed and openly licensed, not original research.

What do entity, intent and timing mean?

They are the causal coding. Entity is whether a human or the AI system is the cause; intent is whether the harm was intentional or not; timing is whether it arises before or after deployment. Together they let you separate misuse from malfunction.

Can I export the results?

Yes, any filtered set exports as CSV or JSON, and every export carries the upstream source, licence and citation with it, because attribution is a condition of the licence rather than a courtesy.

What is the MIT AI Risk Repository?

A living database of AI risks extracted from published frameworks, taxonomies and papers, classified by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing and by a domain taxonomy of seven domains and 24 subdomains. It is published by the MIT AI Risk Initiative under CC BY 4.0.