MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

2 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

2 entries

  1. 09.05.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    AI jurisprudence

    AI jurisprudence

    "When considering legal frameworks, we note that at present no such framework has been identified in literature which would apply blame and responsibility to an autonomous agent for its actions. (Though we do suggest that the recent establishment of laws regarding autonomous vehicles may provide some early frameworks that can be evaluated for efficacy and gaps in future research.) Frequently the literature refers to existing liability and negligence laws which might apply to the manufacturer or operator of a device."

    From Managing the ethical and risk implications of rapid advances in artificial intelligence: A literature review (Meek2016)

  2. 09.05.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Liability and negligence

    Liability and negligence

    "Liability and negligence are legal gray areas in artificial intelligence. If you leave your children in the care of a robotic nanny, and it malfunctions, are you liable or is the manufacturer [45]? We see here a legal gray area which can be further clarified through legislation at the national and international levels; for example, if by making the manufacturer responsible for defects in operation, this may provide an incentive for manufactures to take safety engineering and machine ethics into consideration, whereas a failure to legislate in this area may result in negligentlydeveloped AI sy

    From Managing the ethical and risk implications of rapid advances in artificial intelligence: A literature review (Meek2016)

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.