MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

2 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

2 entries

  1. 72.04.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Systemic Risks

    Market Concentration and Infrastructure Dependencies:

    "Over-reliance on a limited number of dominant AI providers could create critical single points of failure across essential services. Market concentration in AI development may lead to scenarios where technical failures, cyber-attacks, or policy decisions by a few companies could simultaneously disrupt healthcare systems, financial services, transportation networks, and communication infrastructure, creating cascading failures across interconnected critical systems."

    From Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (Tse2025)

  2. 72.04.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Systemic Risks

    Global AI Research and Development Divides:

    "Asymmetric AI development capabilities between nations could exacerbate geopolitical tensions and create new forms of technological dependency. Countries lacking advanced AI capabilities may become increasingly dependent on foreign AI systems for critical functions, while AI-leading nations may gain disproportionate influence over global economic and security systems, potentially destabilizing international cooperation frameworks."

    From Frontier AI Risk Management Framework (v1.0) (Tse2025)

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.