New York (United States) AI rules mapped to NIST AI RMF
Each row is one legal duty recorded for New York (United States) and the function of NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 it corresponds to. Use it to find which duties your existing evidence already reaches.
Coverage of this crosswalk
5 of 5 recorded New York (United States) duties carry a mapping
The denominator is the number of duties this platform has broken out for New York (United States), not the number of duties the law contains. Unmapped duties are ones no reviewer has crosswalked yet, not ones the standard fails to address.
The mapping
| Legal duty | Binding? | NIST AI RMF function | Why they correspond | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employers and employment agencies must obtain an independent bias audit before using an automated employment decision tool NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools), NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(a)(1); 6 RCNY Section 5-301 | Legal requirement | MEASURE 2.11, MEASURE 1.3 | Fairness evaluation by independent assessors. | high |
| Employers and employment agencies must publish a summary of the bias audit results NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools), NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(a)(2); 6 RCNY Section 5-302 | Legal requirement | GOVERN 4.2, MEASURE 2.11 | Public transparency of fairness results. | medium |
| Employers and employment agencies must notify candidates and employees before an automated tool is used NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools), NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(1) and (b)(2); 6 RCNY Section 5-303 | Legal requirement | GOVERN 5.1, MANAGE 4.1 | Transparency to affected individuals. | medium |
| Employers and employment agencies must let candidates request an alternative selection process or accommodation NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools), NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(1); 6 RCNY Section 5-303 | Legal requirement | GOVERN 5.1, MANAGE 4.1 | Recourse route for affected individuals. | medium |
| Employers and employment agencies must disclose the data collected and their retention policy for the tool NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools), NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(3); 6 RCNY Section 5-303 | Legal requirement | MAP 2.2, MEASURE 2.10 | Data documentation and privacy transparency. | medium |
What a mapping means
The duty and the function ask for overlapping work, so evidence produced for one is likely to be reusable for the other. Confidence records how direct that overlap is.
What it does not mean
NIST AI RMF adoption does not discharge a legal duty and carries no force in New York (United States). A mapped row still has to be complied with on the statute's own terms.
Instruments in this crosswalk
- NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools) — New York (United States)
Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.
Frequently asked questions
- Does NIST AI RMF adoption satisfy New York (United States) AI rules?
- No. NIST AI RMF is a voluntary framework and carries no legal force in New York (United States). This crosswalk records that 5 of the 5 duties tracked here have a corresponding clause, which means the evidence may be reusable, not that the duty is discharged.
- How many New York (United States) AI duties map to NIST AI RMF?
- 5 of 5 duties recorded for New York (United States) carry a mapping to NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0.