Employers and employment agencies must disclose the data collected and their retention policy for the tool
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools), NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(3); 6 RCNY Section 5-303
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Employers and employment agencies must disclose the data collected and their retention policy for the tool is a legal requirement under NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools) in New York (United States) (NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(3); 6 RCNY Section 5-303). It applies from 5 July 2023. The record carries 2 evidence examples and mappings to 2 frameworks.
- Jurisdiction
- New York (United States)
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(3); 6 RCNY Section 5-303
- Applies from
- 5 July 2023
- Who it binds
- Deployer / user organisation
- Evidence examples
- 2
- Framework mappings
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0, ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- Controls that meet it
- 2
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026
What does it require?
Unless already disclosed on the website, an employer or employment agency must provide, within 30 days of a written request from a candidate or employee, information about the type of data the automated employment decision tool collects, the source of that data, and the employer's or agency's data retention policy. The DCWP rules allow this information to be posted publicly instead of answered case by case.
Practical action
Publish a short data notice for the tool covering data types, sources and retention, or set up a 30-day response process for written requests.
Who does it apply to?
Employers and employment agencies using an automated employment decision tool for New York City residents.
- Sectors
- Employment and HR
- Use cases
- AI in hiring and employment
Applies from:
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesProcessData protection officer · once per ai systemPrivacy and data-protection controls for AI
Serves 13 recorded duties · evidence: Data protection impact assessment for an AI system, AI data-flow and legal-basis record, Privacy notice section on AI use
Data notice with types, sources and retention.
-
supportsProcessData governance lead · once per ai systemData governance and dataset documentation
Serves 8 recorded duties · evidence: Dataset documentation sheet, Data quality and bias check report, Dataset approval for use
Source of the data inventory disclosed.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability
Assessment · XLSX · v3
- NIST AI RMF ↔ EU AI Act ↔ ISO/IEC 42001 Crosswalk
Crosswalk · XLSX · v5
- AI Data Governance Register
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v3
- AI Audit Evidence Tracker
Register · XLSX · v1
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Data collection and retention notice for the tool | document | |
| Request response log | register |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every New York (United States) duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | MAP 2.2, MEASURE 2.10 | Data documentation and privacy transparency. | medium |
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Annex A.7.2, A.8.5 | Data management and information for interested parties. | medium |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools) (NYC Administrative Code Section 20-871(b)(3); 6 RCNY Section 5-303).
Who must comply with this obligation?
Employers and employment agencies using an automated employment decision tool for New York City residents.
When does this obligation apply?
It applies from 5 July 2023.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: Data collection and retention notice for the tool; Request response log.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 MAP 2.2, MEASURE 2.10, ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A.7.2, A.8.5. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
Privacy and data-protection controls for AI; Data governance and dataset documentation.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Publish a short data notice for the tool covering data types, sources and retention, or set up a 30-day response process for written requests.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Employers and employment agencies must disclose the data collected and their retention policy for the tool (NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools))” [AIPT-OBL-0103, verified 26 September 2026 by Bhaskar Bhatt]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0103 (accessed 8 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0103: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: Automated Employment Decision Tools (AEDT), NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, https://www.nyc.gov/site/dca/about/automated-employment-decision-tools.page.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_employersandemploymentag,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Employers and employment agencies must disclose the data collected and their retention policy for the tool (NYC Local Law 144 (automated employment decision tools))}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-city-local-law-144-data-policy-disclosure}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-new-york-city-local-law-144-data-policy-disclosure},
urldate = {2026-11-08},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 8 November 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Deployers must use the provider's transparency information in their data protection impact assessment — EU AI Act, European Union
- Collect and use personal information only with consent and for the stated purpose — Nepal Privacy Act 2075, Nepal
- Process personal data only with valid consent or a legitimate use, after notice — India DPDP Act, India
- Identify consent or an applicable PDPA exception before using personal data in AI — PDPC AI advisory guidelines, Singapore
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.