Human oversight: AI obligations

Practical requirements extracted from policy instruments, with the source article, the actors they bind, evidence examples and original framework mappings. Legal requirements are marked; everything else is voluntary guidance.

jurisdiction: uk × category: human_oversight ×

Keyword

Jurisdiction

Obligation category

Sector

AI use case

Actor

Binding

Reset

2 results

Legal requirement human oversight United Kingdom

Apply safeguards to solely automated decisions with significant effects

ICO AI guidance · UK GDPR Article 22 as amended by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025

Individuals have rights in relation to solely automated decisions that produce legal or similarly significant effects, including being told about the decision, obtaining human intervention, and contesting it. The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 amended these rules; the reviewer must confirm the current wording.

Source-linked

Voluntary guidance human oversight United Kingdom

Provide routes to contest AI outcomes and seek redress

UK AI regulation framework · Principle 5, Part 3

Affected people should be able to contest harmful AI decisions or outcomes and obtain redress, through existing complaint routes and regulators.

Source-linked