Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker
Search
Menu

AI regulation applicability check

Answer a few questions to see which recorded policies and obligations overlap with your situation, what to investigate next and where the official sources are.

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Educational screening only; not legal advice. Results reflect the scope recorded in our data, not a determination that any law applies to you.

1. Markets or jurisdictions

Where you sell, deploy or have users. The number beside a name is how many instruments are recorded for it.

Africa (55)
Americas (54)
Asia (61) 2 selected
Europe (58)
International (1)
Oceania (20)
5. Personal or sensitive data involved?
6. Does the use affect any of these areas?
7. Generative or general-purpose AI involved?
Reset

Screening summary

6 duties may apply · 1 already in force · next date: none recorded

Application date not recorded for 5 of them. A duty's date is its own application date, else its instrument's.

Register XLSXRegister CSVRegister JSONRegister PDFOne row per screened duty, cited; nothing stored.

Watch this screening

Sign in to save this screening and get a daily alert when a change may affect it, naming the system and linking the official source.

Screening is relevance, not a legal determination. Nothing about your systems is published.

Likely relevant policies

Ranked by overlap with your answers. "Why" explains the match; it is not a legal conclusion.

Obligations to review

Controls to build first

The controls that meet the obligations above, sorted by how many of them each one satisfies. Each control page lists the evidence a reviewer would expect.

Questions to investigate

  1. Which entity in your group places the AI system on the market or uses it, and in which country is it established?
  2. Does the system process personal data, and is there a lawful basis and impact assessment under the applicable data-protection law?
  3. Do you provide a general-purpose or generative model, or only integrate one? Provider and deployer duties differ, including content labelling and training-data transparency.
  4. Which official sources set the application dates that matter for your launch plan, and have any been amended?
  5. Are you subject to sector rules (financial, health, telecoms, employment) that already regulate automated decisions?

Starter action checklist

  • Create an AI system inventory with owner, purpose, users, jurisdictions and data types.
  • Assign a role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor) for each system and market.
  • Screen each system against prohibited practices and high-risk categories in the relevant instruments.
  • Record the official source and date for every conclusion; set a review date.
  • Prepare core evidence: risk assessment, data documentation, human-oversight procedure, user notices, incident process.
  • Have qualified counsel review classifications and confirm applicable dates before relying on them.
Compare selected jurisdictions

Frequently asked questions

Is this a legal assessment?

No. It is an educational screen that matches what you tell it against recorded obligations and shows which ones may reach you. It cannot see your systems, your contracts or your markets, and it is not advice.

What happens to my answers?

Nothing is required to run the screen. If you sign in you can save a profile so the screen can be re-run when records change; otherwise the answers are not stored.

Why does it say "may apply" rather than "applies"?

Because applicability turns on facts the screen does not have, and because most records here have not yet been confirmed by a named reviewer. Overstating certainty would be the most harmful thing this tool could do.