AIPolicyTracker

AI incident ·

Infinite Campus AI-Driven Student Risk Model Leads to Cuts in Support for Nevada's Low-Income Schools

1 news report Synced from source · record last edited 3 Sep 2026

In brief

An AI system built by Infinite Campus and deployed by Nevada Department of Education allegedly harmed Students, Somerset Academy and 6 others.

Risk domain
Discrimination and Toxicity Unequal performance across groups
Occurred
Coverage
1 reportOct 2024

What happened

An AI system developed by Infinite Campus and deployed by Nevada to identify at-risk students reportedly led to a sharp reduction in the number classified as needing support, dropping from 270,000 to 65,000. The reclassification allegedly caused significant budget cuts in schools serving low-income populations. The drastic reduction in identified at-risk students reportedly left thousands of vulnerable children without resources and support.

Editor's notes

Timeline notes and clarification: Before 2023, Nevada identified at-risk students mostly by income, using free or reduced-price lunch eligibility as the key measure. In 2022, this system classified over 270,000 students as at-risk. Looking to improve the process, Nevada partnered with Infinite Campus in 2023 to introduce an AI system that used more factors like GPA, attendance, household structure, and home language. The new system was meant to better predict which students might struggle in school. However, during the 2023-2024 school year, the AI cut the number of at-risk students to less than 65,000. This reclassification caused budget cuts in schools that depended on the funding tied to at-risk students, especially those serving low-income populations. By October 2024, the problem gained national attention.

Laws that address this harm

Policy angle: Classified under Discrimination and Toxicity (Unequal performance across groups) in the MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy; 5 recorded instruments address this use case.

Matched from the record's risk domain and country to the instruments recorded here. A reviewer can correct the match in the repository (data/external/incident_overrides.yaml).

News reports (1)

Titles link to the original publisher; report text is not reproduced here.

Who was involved

Alleged developer
Infinite Campus
Alleged harmed party
Students Somerset Academy Nevada school districts Minors Mater Academy of Nevada Educational communities Economically vulnerable students in Nevada Economically vulnerable people

AI systems implicated

Infinite CampusAI-enabled decision support systems

Classification (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy)

Causal entity
AI
Intent
Intentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm level
—
Sectors
—
Countries
—

Risk entries describing this failure mode

Entries from the MIT AI Risk Repository coded to subdomain 1.3.

  • Bias and discrimination (value embedding)

    "Generative AI models may also be subject to the “value embedding” phenomenon.361 “Value embedding” refers to the fact that developers of generative AI models strive to minimize biased outputs by retraining their models...

    Regulating under Uncertainty: Governance Options for Generative AI (G'sell2024)

  • Impact on affected communities

    "It is important to include the perspectives or concerns of communities that are affected by model outcomes when designing and building models. Failing to include these perspectives makes it difficult to understand the r...

    AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  • Unfair capability distribution

    "Performing worse for some groups than others in a way that harms the worse-off group"

    A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

  • Disparate Performance

    The LLM’s performances can differ significantly across different groups of users. For example, the question-answering capability showed significant performance differences across different racial and social status groups...

    Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

  • Fairness

    Avoiding bias and ensuring no disparate performance

    Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

  • Ideological Homogenization from Value Embedding

    "The increasing integration of general purpose AI models into every-day life raises concerns around their embedded normative values. The reach of a small number of AI models to a large number of people around the world c...

    Governing General Purpose AI: A Comprehensive Map of Unreliability, Misuse and Systemic Risks (Maham2023 )

  • Fairness

    This challenge appears when the learning model leads to a decision that is biased to some sensitive attributes... data itself could be biased, which results in unfair decisions. Therefore, this problem should be solved o...

    A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Challenges: Analyzing the Definitions, Relationships, and Evolutions (Saghiri2022)

  • Increased labor

    increased burden (e.g., time spent) or effort required by members of certain social groups to make systems or products work as well for them as others

    Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reduction (Shelby2023)

Linked by editors or by text similarity in the source dataset.

Incidents in the same risk subdomain

All incidents in this subdomain

Source record: incident #808 on the AI Incident Database · all 1 report