AIPolicyTracker

AI incident ·

UK Facial Recognition System Reportedly Exhibits Higher False Positive Rates for Black and Asian Subjects

4 news reports Snapshot 7 Sep 2026

In brief

An AI system built by Unknown Facial Recognition Technology Developers and deployed by Home Office, Metropolitan Police and 3 others allegedly harmed General Public, General Public Of The United Kingdom and 5 others.

Risk domain
Discrimination and Toxicity Unequal performance across groups
Occurred
Coverage
4 reportsDec 2025

What happened

UK government testing of police facial recognition technology reportedly found significantly higher false positive identification rates for Black and Asian individuals compared with white subjects, with particularly elevated error rates for Black women. The findings reportedly emerged from analysis of retrospective searches of the police national database and were disclosed by the Home Office amid plans for expanded national deployment.

Laws that address this harm

Policy angle: Classified under Discrimination and Toxicity (Unequal performance across groups) in the MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy; 5 recorded instruments address this use case.

Matched from the record's risk domain and country to the instruments recorded here. A reviewer can correct the match in the repository (data/external/incident_overrides.yaml).

News reports (4)

Titles link to the original publisher; report text is not reproduced here.

  1. UK police forces lobbied to use biased facial recognition technology
    theguardian.com · Mark Wilding, Daniel Boffey

Who was involved

Alleged harmed party
General Public, General Public Of The United Kingdom, Minorities In The United Kingdom, Black People In The United Kingdom, Asian People In The United Kingdom, Epistemic Integrity, National Security And Intelligence Stakeholders

Classification (MIT AI Risk Repository taxonomy)

Causal entity
AI
Intent
Unintentional
Timing
Post-deployment
Harm level
—
Sectors
—
Countries
—

Risk entries describing this failure mode

Entries from the MIT AI Risk Repository coded to subdomain 1.3.

  • Bias and discrimination (value embedding)

    "Generative AI models may also be subject to the “value embedding” phenomenon.361 “Value embedding” refers to the fact that developers of generative AI models strive to minimize biased outputs by retraining their models...

    Regulating under Uncertainty: Governance Options for Generative AI (G'sell2024)

  • Impact on affected communities

    "It is important to include the perspectives or concerns of communities that are affected by model outcomes when designing and building models. Failing to include these perspectives makes it difficult to understand the r...

    AI Risk Atlas (IBM2025)

  • Unfair capability distribution

    "Performing worse for some groups than others in a way that harms the worse-off group"

    A Closer Look at the Existing Risks of Generative AI: Mapping the Who, What, and How of Real-World Incidents (Li2025)

  • Disparate Performance

    The LLM’s performances can differ significantly across different groups of users. For example, the question-answering capability showed significant performance differences across different racial and social status groups...

    Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

  • Fairness

    Avoiding bias and ensuring no disparate performance

    Trustworthy LLMs: A Survey and Guideline for Evaluating Large Language Models’ Alignment (Liu2024)

  • Ideological Homogenization from Value Embedding

    "The increasing integration of general purpose AI models into every-day life raises concerns around their embedded normative values. The reach of a small number of AI models to a large number of people around the world c...

    Governing General Purpose AI: A Comprehensive Map of Unreliability, Misuse and Systemic Risks (Maham2023 )

  • Fairness

    This challenge appears when the learning model leads to a decision that is biased to some sensitive attributes... data itself could be biased, which results in unfair decisions. Therefore, this problem should be solved o...

    A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Challenges: Analyzing the Definitions, Relationships, and Evolutions (Saghiri2022)

  • Increased labor

    increased burden (e.g., time spent) or effort required by members of certain social groups to make systems or products work as well for them as others

    Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reduction (Shelby2023)

Incidents in the same risk subdomain

All incidents in this subdomain

Source record: incident #1305 on the AI Incident Database · all 4 reports