MIT AI Risk Repository
Browse AI risks
2,500 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.
-
17.01.00 · Risk Category
"Social harms that arise from the language model producing discriminatory or exclusionary speech"
-
18.01.00 · Risk Category
"AI systems under-, over-, or misrepresenting certain groups or generating toxic, offensive, abusive, or hateful content"
-
19.05.00 · Risk Category
"In the context of ethical AI risks, two risks are of particular importance. First, AI systems may lack a legitimate ethical basis in establishing rules that greatly influence society and human relationships (Wirtz & Müller, 2019). In addition, AI-based discrimination refers to an unfair treatment of certain population groups by AI systems. As humans initially programme AI systems, serve as their potential data source, and have an impact on the associated data processes and databases, human biases and prejudices may also become part of AI systems and be reproduced (Weyerer & Langer, 2019, 2020
-
28.02.00 · Risk Category
"This type of safety problem is mainly about social bias across various topics such as race, gender, religion, etc. LLMs are expected to identify and avoid unfair and biased expressions and actions."
-
50.04.02 · Risk Sub-Category
Legal and Rights-Related Risks
Discrimination/Bias (Discriminatory Activities)
—
-
"Stereotyping - Derogatory or otherwise harmful stereotyping or homogenisation of individuals, groups, societies or cultures due to the mis-representation, over-representation, under-representation, or non- representation of specific identities, groups, or perspectives."
-
62.34.00 · Risk Category
—
-
"AI systems under-, over-, or misrepresenting certain groups or generating toxic, offensive, abusive, or hateful content"
-
"The training datasets of LLMs may contain biased information that leads LLMs to generate outputs with social biases"
-
02.08.00 · Risk Category
"Extensive data collection in LLMs brings toxic content and stereotypical bias into the training data."
-
"Compared with the definition of toxicity, the definition of bias is more subjective and contextdependent. Based on previous work [97], [101], we describe the bias as disparities that could raise demographic differences among various groups, which may involve demographic word prevalence and stereotypical contents. Concretely, in massive corpora, the prevalence of different pronouns and identities could influence an LLM’s tendency about gender, nationality, race, religion, and culture [4]. For instance, the pronoun He is over-represented compared with the pronoun She in the training corpora, le
-
03.01.00 · Risk Category
"These are the most mentioned cases. They refer to situations where the algorithm or the training data lead to unreliable outputs. These systems frequently assign disproportionate weight to some variables, like race or gender, but there is no transparency to this effect, making them impossible to challenge. These situations are typically only identified when regulators or the press examine the systems under freedom of information acts. Nevertheless, the damage they cause to people’s lives can be dramatic, such as lost homes, divorces, prosecution, or incarceration. Besides the inherent technic
-
04.02.00 · Risk Category
Social bias is an unfairly negative attitude towards a social group or individuals based on one-sided or inaccurate information, typically pertaining to widely disseminated negative stereotypes regarding gender, race, religion, etc.
-
05.01.00 · Risk Category
Fairness is, by far, the most discussed issue in the literature, remaining a paramount concern especially in case of LLMs and text-to-image models. This is sparked by training data biases propagating into model outputs, causing negative effects like stereotyping, racism, sexism, ideological leanings, or the marginalization of minorities. Next to attesting generative AI a conservative inclination by perpetuating existing societal patterns, there is a concern about reinforcing existing biases when training new generative models with synthetic data from previous models. Beyond technical fairness
-
06.03.00 · Risk Category
"When AI is not carefully designed, it can discriminate against certain groups."
-
"The AI will only be as good as the data it is trained with. If the data contains bias (and much data does), then the AI will manifest that bias, too."
-
10.01.00 · Risk Category
"The decision process used by AI systems has the potential to present biased choices, either because it acts from criteria that will generate forms of bias or because it is based on the history of choices."
-
10.02.00 · Risk Category
"Poorly designed intelligent systems can cause moral, psychological, and physical harm. For example, the use of predictive policing tools may cause more people to be arrested or physically harmed by the police."
-
10.03.00 · Risk Category
"The risks associated with the use of AI are still unpredictable and unprecedented, and there are already several examples that show AI has made discriminatory decisions against minorities, reinforced social stereotypes in Internet search engines and enabled data breaches."
-
11.01.00 · Risk Category
"beliefs about different social groups that reproduce unjust societal hierarchies"
-
Stereotyping in an algorithmic system refers to how the system’s outputs reflect “beliefs about the characteristics, attributes, and behaviors of members of certain groups....and about how and why certain attributes go together"
-
Demeaning of social groups to occur when they are when they are “cast as being lower status and less deserving of respect"... discourses, images, and language used to marginalize or oppress a social group... Controlling images include forms of human-animal confusion in image tagging systems
-
when an image tagging system does not acknowledge the relevance of someone’s membership in a specific social group to what is depicted in one or more images
-
complex and non-traditional ways in which humans are represented and classified automatically, and often at the cost of autonomy loss... such as categorizing someone who identifies as non-binary into a gendered category they do not belong ... undermines people’s ability to disclose aspects of their identity on their own terms
-
algorithmic systems that reify essentialist social categories can be understood as when systems that classify a person’s membership in a social group based on narrow, socially constructed criteria that reinforce perceptions of human difference as inherent, static and seemingly natural... especially likely when ML models or human raters classify a person’s attributes – for instance, their gender, race, or sexual orientation – by making assumptions based on their physical appearance
-
11.02.00 · Risk Category
"These harms occur when a system withholds information, opportunities, or resources [22] from historically marginalized groups in domains that affect material well-being [146], such as housing [47], employment [201], social services [15, 201], finance [117], education [119], and healthcare [158]."
-
Opportunity loss occurs when algorithmic systems enable disparate access to information and resources needed to equitably participate in society, including the withholding of housing through targeting ads based on race [10] and social services along lines of class [84]
-
Financial harms [52, 160] co-produced through algorithmic systems, especially as they relate to lived experiences of poverty and economic inequality... demonetization algorithms that parse content titles, metadata, and text, and it may penalize words with multiple meanings [51, 81], disproportionately impacting queer, trans, and creators of color [81]. Differential pricing algorithms, where people are systematically shown different prices for the same products, also leads to economic loss [55]. These algorithms may be especially sensitive to feedback loops from existing inequities related to e
-
12.05.00 · Risk Category
"The potential for AI systems to make decisions that systematically disadvantage certain groups or individuals. Bias can stem from training data, algorithmic design, or deployment practices, leading to unfair outcomes and possible legal ramifications."
-
13.01.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Impacts: The Technical Base System
Bias, Stereotypes, and Representational Harms
"Generative AI systems can embed and amplify harmful biases that are most detrimental to marginalized peoples."
-
"Generative AI systems are capable of exacerbating inequality, as seen in sections on 4.1.1 Bias, Stereotypes, and Representational Harms and 4.1.2 Cultural Values and Sensitive Content, and Disparate Performance. When deployed or updated, systems' impacts on people and groups can directly and indirectly be used to harm and exploit vulnerable and marginalized groups."
-
"The general principle of equal treatment requires that an AI system upholds the principle of fairness, both ethically and legally. This means that the same facts are treated equally for each person unless there is an objective justification for unequal treatment."
-
This is the risk of an ML system encoding stereotypes of or performing disproportionately poorly for some demographics/social groups.
-
16.01.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Risk area 1: Discrimination, Hate speech and Exclusion
Social stereotypes and unfair discrimination
"The reproduction of harmful stereotypes is well-documented in models that represent natural language [32]. Large-scale LMs are trained on text sources, such as digitised books and text on the internet. As a result, the LMs learn demeaning language and stereotypes about groups who are frequently marginalised."
-
16.01.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Risk area 1: Discrimination, Hate speech and Exclusion
Exclusionary norms
"In language, humans express social categories and norms, which exclude groups who live outside of them [58]. LMs that faithfully encode patterns present in language necessarily encode such norms."
-
16.05.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Risk area 5: Human-Computer Interaction Harms
Promoting harmful stereotypes by implying gender or ethnic identity
"CAs can perpetuate harmful stereotypes by using particular identity markers in language (e.g. referring to “self” as “female”), or by more general design features (e.g. by giving the product a gendered name such as Alexa). The risk of representational harm in these cases is that the role of “assistant” is presented as inherently linked to the female gender [19, 36]. Gender or ethnicity identity markers may be implied by CA vocabulary, knowledge or vernacular [124]; product description, e.g. in one case where users could choose as virtual assistant Jake - White, Darnell - Black, Antonio - Hisp
-
17.01.01 · Risk Sub-Category
Discrimination, Exclusion and Toxicity
Social stereotypes and unfair discrmination
"Perpetuating harmful stereotypes and discrimination is a well-documented harm in machine learning models that represent natural language (Caliskan et al., 2017). LMs that encode discriminatory language or social stereotypes can cause different types of harm... Unfair discrimination manifests in differential treatment or access to resources among individuals or groups based on sensitive traits such as sex, religion, gender, sexual orientation, ability and age."
-
"In language, humans express social categories and norms. Language models (LMs) that faithfully encode patterns present in natural language necessarily encode such norms and categories...such norms and categories exclude groups who live outside them (Foucault and Sheridan, 2012). For example, defining the term “family” as married parents of male and female gender with a blood-related child, denies the existence of families to whom these criteria do not apply"
-
17.05.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Human-Computer Interaction Harms
Promoting harmful stereotypes by implying gender or ethnic identity
"A conversational agent may invoke associations that perpetuate harmful stereotypes, either by using particular identity markers in language (e.g. referring to “self” as “female”), or by more general design features (e.g. by giving the product a gendered name)."
-
"Mis-, under-, or over-representing certain identities, groups, or perspectives or failing to represent them at all (e.g. via homogenisation, stereotypes)"
-
"Eroding trust in public information and knowledge"
-
19.01.03 · Risk Sub-Category
Technological, Data and Analytical AI Risks
Lack of data, poor data quality, and biases in training data
—
-
19.05.02 · Risk Sub-Category
Unfair statistical AI decisions and discrimination of minorities
—
-
"AI discrimination is a challenge raised by many researchers and governments and refers to the prevention of bias and injustice caused by the actions of AI systems (Bostrom & Yudkowsky, 2014; Weyerer & Langer, 2019). If the dataset used to train an algorithm does not reflect the real world accurately, the AI could learn false associations or prejudices and will carry those into its future data processing. If an AI algorithm is used to compute information relevant to human decisions, such as hiring or applying for a loan or mortgage, biased data can lead to discrimination against parts of the s
-
"Specifically, data bias refers to certain groups or certain types of elements that are over-weighted or over-represented than others in AI/ ML models, or variables that are crucial to characterize a phenomenon of interest, but are not properly captured by the learned models."
-
"While data bias is a major contributor of model bias, model bias actually manifests itself in different forms and shapes, such as presentation bias, model evaluation bias, and popularity bias. In addition, model bias arises from various sources [62], such as AI/ML model selection (e.g., support vector machine, decision trees), regularization methods, algorithm configurations, and optimization techniques."
-
"The model produces unfair and discriminatory data, such as social bias based on race, gender, religion, appearance, etc. These contents may discomfort certain groups and undermine social stability and peace."
-
as they claim to generate biased and discriminatory results, these AI systems have a negative impact on the rights of individuals, principles of adjudication, and overall judicial integrity
-
In the context of LLM outputs, we want to make sure the suggested or completed texts are indistinguishable in nature for two involved individuals (in the prompt) with the same relevant profiles but might come from different groups (where the group attribute is regarded as being irrelevant in this context)
-
LLMs must not exhibit or highlight any stereotypes in the generated text. Pretrained LLMs tend to pick up stereotype biases persisting in crowdsourced data and further amplify them
Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.