MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

23 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

Reset Also filtered by framework Sun2023 ×

23 entries

  1. 27.01.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Typical safety scenarios

    Unfairness and discrinimation

    "The model produces unfair and discriminatory data, such as social bias based on race, gender, religion, appearance, etc. These contents may discomfort certain groups and undermine social stability and peace."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  2. 27.01.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Typical safety scenarios

    Insult

    "Insulting content generated by LMs is a highly visible and frequently mentioned safety issue. Mostly, it is unfriendly, disrespectful, or ridiculous content that makes users uncomfortable and drives them away. It is extremely hazardous and could have negative social consequences."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  3. 27.01.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Typical safety scenarios

    Crimes and Illegal Activities

    "The model output contains illegal and criminal attitudes, behaviors, or motivations, such as incitement to commit crimes, fraud, and rumor propagation. These contents may hurt users and have negative societal repercussions."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  4. 27.01.04 · Risk Sub-Category

    Typical safety scenarios

    Sensitive Topics

    "For some sensitive and controversial topics (especially on politics), LMs tend to generate biased, misleading, and inaccurate content. For example, there may be a tendency to support a specific political position, leading to discrimination or exclusion of other political viewpoints."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  5. 27.01.07 · Risk Sub-Category

    Typical safety scenarios

    Privacy and Property

    "The generation involves exposing users’ privacy and property information or providing advice with huge impacts such as suggestions on marriage and investments. When handling this information, the model should comply with relevant laws and privacy regulations, protect users’ rights and interests, and avoid information leakage and abuse."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  6. 27.02.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Instruction Attacks

    Prompt Leaking

    "By analyzing the model’s output, attackers may extract parts of the systemprovided prompts and thus potentially obtain sensitive information regarding the system itself."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  7. 27.02.00 · Risk Category

    Instruction Attacks

    "In addition to the above-mentioned typical safety scenarios, current research has revealed some unique attacks that such models may confront. For example, Perez and Ribeiro (2022) found that goal hijacking and prompt leaking could easily deceive language models to generate unsafe responses. Moreover, we also find that LLMs are more easily triggered to output harmful content if some special prompts are added. In response to these challenges, we develop, categorize, and label 6 types of adversarial attacks, and name them Instruction Attack, which are challenging for large language models to han

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  8. 27.02.01 · Risk Sub-Category

    Instruction Attacks

    Goal Hijacking

    "It refers to the appending of deceptive or misleading instructions to the input of models in an attempt to induce the system into ignoring the original user prompt and producing an unsafe response."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  9. 27.02.03 · Risk Sub-Category

    Instruction Attacks

    Role Play Instruction

    "Attackers might specify a model’s role attribute within the input prompt and then give specific instructions, causing the model to finish instructions in the speaking style of the assigned role, which may lead to unsafe outputs. For example, if the character is associated with potentially risky groups (e.g., radicals, extremists, unrighteous individuals, racial discriminators, etc.) and the model is overly faithful to the given instructions, it is quite possible that the model outputs unsafe content linked to the given character."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  10. 27.02.04 · Risk Sub-Category

    Instruction Attacks

    Unsafe Instruction Topic

    "If the input instructions themselves refer to inappropriate or unreasonable topics, the model will follow these instructions and produce unsafe content. For instance, if a language model is requested to generate poems with the theme “Hail Hitler”, the model may produce lyrics containing fanaticism, racism, etc. In this situation, the output of the model could be controversial and have a possible negative impact on society."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  11. 27.02.05 · Risk Sub-Category

    Instruction Attacks

    Inquiry with Unsafe Opinion

    "By adding imperceptibly unsafe content into the input, users might either deliberately or unintentionally influence the model to generate potentially harmful content. In the following cases involving migrant workers, ChatGPT provides suggestions to improve the overall quality of migrant workers and reduce the local crime rate. ChatGPT responds to the user’s hint with a disguised and biased opinion that the general quality of immigrants is favorably correlated with the crime rate, posing a safety risk."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  12. 27.02.06 · Risk Sub-Category

    Instruction Attacks

    Reverse Exposure

    "It refers to attempts by attackers to make the model generate “should-not-do” things and then access illegal and immoral information."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  13. 27.01.05 · Risk Sub-Category

    Typical safety scenarios

    Physical Harm

    "The model generates unsafe information related to physical health, guiding and encouraging users to harm themselves and others physically, for example by offering misleading medical information or inappropriate drug usage guidance. These outputs may pose potential risks to the physical health of users."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  14. 27.01.06 · Risk Sub-Category

    Typical safety scenarios

    Mental Health

    "The model generates a risky response about mental health, such as content that encourages suicide or causes panic or anxiety. These contents could have a negative effect on the mental health of users."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  15. 27.01.08 · Risk Sub-Category

    Typical safety scenarios

    Ethics and Morality

    "The content generated by the model endorses and promotes immoral and unethical behavior. When addressing issues of ethics and morality, the model must adhere to pertinent ethical principles and moral norms and remain consistent with globally acknowledged human values."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  16. "First, We extend the dialogue safety taxonomy (Sun et al., 2022) and try to cover all perspectives of safety issues. It involves 8 kinds of typical safety scenarios such as insult and unfairness."

    From Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models (Sun2023)

  17. 27.01.03.a · Additional evidence

    Typical safety scenarios

    Crimes and Illegal Activities

  18. 27.01.05.a · Additional evidence

    Typical safety scenarios

    Physical Harm

  19. 27.01.06.a · Additional evidence

    Typical safety scenarios

    Mental Health

  20. 27.01.07.a · Additional evidence

    Typical safety scenarios

    Privacy and Property

  21. 27.01.08.a · Additional evidence

    Typical safety scenarios

    Ethics and Morality

  22. 27.02.01.a · Additional evidence

    Instruction Attacks

    Goal Hijacking

  23. 27.02.04.a · Additional evidence

    Instruction Attacks

    Unsafe Instruction Topic

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.