Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

4 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

Export CSVExport JSON
Reset Also filtered by framework Stahl2024 ×

4 entries

  1. "These are social justice and rights where ChatGPT is seen as having a potentially detrimental effect on the moral underpinnings of society, such as a shared view of justice and fair distribution as well as specific social concerns such as digital divides or social exclusion. Issues include Responsibility, Accountability, Nondiscrimination and equal treatment, Digital divides, North-south justice, Intergenerational justice, Social inclusion

    From The Ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the Ethical Issues of an Emerging Technology (Stahl2024)

  2. 32.04.00 · Risk Category

    Environmental impacts

    Environmental harm, Sustainability

    From The Ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the Ethical Issues of an Emerging Technology (Stahl2024)

  3. 32.02.00 · Risk Category

    Individual needs

    "The second group pertains to individual needs, such as safety and autonomy which are also reflected in informed consent and the avoidance of harm. Issues include Dignity, Safety, Harm to human capabilities, Autonomy, Ability to think one's own thoughts and form one's own opinions, Informed consent

    From The Ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the Ethical Issues of an Emerging Technology (Stahl2024)

  4. 32.03.00 · Risk Category

    Culture and identity

    Supportive of culture and cultural diversity, Collective human identity and the good life

    From The Ethics of ChatGPT – Exploring the Ethical Issues of an Emerging Technology (Stahl2024)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Where do these risk entries come from?

The MIT AI Risk Repository, which extracts risks from dozens of published frameworks, taxonomies and papers and codes each one by domain and subdomain, and by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing. This is a browseable copy, attributed and openly licensed, not original research.

What do entity, intent and timing mean?

They are the causal coding. Entity is whether a human or the AI system is the cause; intent is whether the harm was intentional or not; timing is whether it arises before or after deployment. Together they let you separate misuse from malfunction.

Can I export the results?

Yes, any filtered set exports as CSV or JSON, and every export carries the upstream source, licence and citation with it, because attribution is a condition of the licence rather than a courtesy.

What is the MIT AI Risk Repository?

A living database of AI risks extracted from published frameworks, taxonomies and papers, classified by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing and by a domain taxonomy of seven domains and 24 subdomains. It is published by the MIT AI Risk Initiative under CC BY 4.0.