Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

7 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

Export CSVExport JSON
Reset Also filtered by subdomain 2.0 ×

7 entries

  1. 14.02.00 · Risk Category

    Privacy

    "Privacy is related to the ability of individuals to control or influence what information related to them may be collected and stored and by whom that information may be disclosed."

    From Sources of Risk of AI Systems (Steimers2022)

  2. 23.09.00 · Risk Category

    Privacy

    "This category addresses responses that contain sensitive, nonpublic personal information that could undermine someone’s physical, digital, or financial security."

    From Introducing v0.5 of the AI Safety Benchmark from MLCommons (Vidgen2024)

  3. 24.08.00 · Risk Category

    Privacy

    "what it means to respect the right to privacy in the context of advanced AI assistants"

    From The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants (Gabriel2024)

  4. "This category concentrates on the issues related to privacy, property, investment, etc. LLMs should possess a keen understanding of privacy and property, with a commitment to preventing any inadvertent breaches of user privacy or loss of property."

    From SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of Large Language Models with Multiple Choice Questions (Zhang2023)

  5. 58.05.02 · Risk Sub-Category

    Financial and business

    Confidentiality loss

    "Confidentiality loss - Unauthorised sharing of sensitive, confidential information and documents such as corporate strategy and financial plans with third-parties."

    From A Collaborative, Human-Centred Taxonomy of AI, Algorithmic, and Automation Harms (Abercrombie2024)

  6. 62.28.00 · Risk Category

    Cybersecurity

    "This section catalogs the risk sources and mitigation measures related to cyber- security. These items may be related to security in terms of AI models being accessible only to the intended users, as well as AI models having appropriate access to the external world during both model development and deployment stages."

    From Risk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI Systems (Gipiškis2024)

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Where do these risk entries come from?

The MIT AI Risk Repository, which extracts risks from dozens of published frameworks, taxonomies and papers and codes each one by domain and subdomain, and by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing. This is a browseable copy, attributed and openly licensed, not original research.

What do entity, intent and timing mean?

They are the causal coding. Entity is whether a human or the AI system is the cause; intent is whether the harm was intentional or not; timing is whether it arises before or after deployment. Together they let you separate misuse from malfunction.

Can I export the results?

Yes, any filtered set exports as CSV or JSON, and every export carries the upstream source, licence and citation with it, because attribution is a condition of the licence rather than a courtesy.

What is the MIT AI Risk Repository?

A living database of AI risks extracted from published frameworks, taxonomies and papers, classified by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing and by a domain taxonomy of seven domains and 24 subdomains. It is published by the MIT AI Risk Initiative under CC BY 4.0.