Brazil vs Peru: AI regulation compared

Brazil records 2 AI policy instruments (0 binding); Peru records 2 (2 binding). They share 0 obligation categories, and 0 of Peru's binding duties fall in categories where Brazil has none. Every cell below is computed from published records linked to their official sources.

Comparison of Brazil, Peru
Category	Brazil Verified 26 Sep 2026 (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)	Peru Verified 26 Sep 2026 (reviewed by Bhaskar Bhatt; a factual check against the official source, not a legal review)
Regulatory status	Instruments on record: Projeto de Lei nº 2338/2023 (2023, bill, proposed); Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial 2024-2028 (2024, strategy, adopted). Each is linked to its official source; human verification pending.	Instruments on record: Ley N° 31814 (2023, act, in force); Decreto Supremo N° 115-2025-PCM (2025, act, in force). Each is linked to its official source; human verification pending.
Binding AI legislation	No AI-specific binding legislation recorded. See status and guidance.	Decreto Supremo N° 115-2025-PCM (In force) Ley N° 31814 (In force)
High-risk AI rules	No high-risk tiering recorded.	No high-risk tiering recorded.
Generative and general-purpose AI rules	No generative-AI-specific obligations recorded.	No generative-AI-specific obligations recorded.
Transparency obligations	No transparency obligations recorded.	No transparency obligations recorded.
Impact assessment	No impact-assessment obligations recorded.	No impact-assessment obligations recorded.
Data governance and personal data	No data-governance obligations recorded.	No data-governance obligations recorded.
Human oversight	No human-oversight obligations recorded.	No human-oversight obligations recorded.
Public-sector requirements	No public-sector-specific requirements recorded.	No public-sector-specific requirements recorded.
Key effective dates	No dated milestones recorded.	No dated milestones recorded.
Official sources	Projeto de Lei nº 2338/2023 – Dispõe sobre o uso da Inteligência Artificial (Bill No. 2338/2023 – On the use of Artificial Intelligence) Plano Brasileiro de Inteligência Artificial 2024-2028 – PBIA (Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Plan 2024-2028)	Ley N° 31814 – Ley que promueve el uso de la inteligencia artificial en favor del desarrollo económico y social del país (Law No. 31814 – Law promoting the use of artificial intelligence for the country's economic and social development) Decreto Supremo N° 115-2025-PCM – Reglamento de la Ley N° 31814 (Supreme Decree No. 115-2025-PCM – Regulation of Law No. 31814)

Cells are generated from published records; a category showing "not recorded" means no source-backed entry exists yet, not that the jurisdiction has no rules. Scroll horizontally on small screens.

If you comply with Brazil, what is left for Peru?

No binding duty is recorded for Peru yet; its instruments are strategies, guidance or existing law. See the record.

Computed from recorded duties by category. Overlap by category is not equivalence: read each provision before treating evidence as reusable. The applicability matrix template lists every binding instrument by jurisdiction.

AI regulation in Brazil AI regulation in Peru Adjust comparison

Frequently asked questions

Which has stricter AI rules, Brazil or Peru?

Brazil records 0 binding AI instruments and Peru records 2. Strictness also depends on scope and enforcement, which the table sets out row by row with links to each record.

If we comply with Brazil, what is left for Peru?

No binding duty recorded for Peru falls outside the categories Brazil already binds; the remaining work is checking 0 shared duties against their own provisions.

Where does this comparison come from?

From the published records for both jurisdictions: instruments, obligations, deadlines and official sources. When a record changes, the comparison changes with it.

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.