Which legal duties does "Quality management system for AI development and supply" satisfy?

It is recorded as satisfying 1 and supporting 2 duties across European Union. A mapping means the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for; the official text decides whether it is enough.

What evidence shows this control is operating?

AI quality management system manual, Internal audit of the AI management system and Management review minutes. Owner: Quality lead. Frequency: annual.

Policy Owner: Quality lead Annual

Quality management system for AI development and supply

Binds the organisation's AI processes into one documented, audited management system so that compliance is repeatable across products rather than reinvented for each one.

Source-linked Context file

Duties satisfied: 1; done properly, does the work
Duties supported: 2; contributes; the duty needs more
Jurisdictions: 1
Evidence items: 3

How is it implemented?

Building on an existing quality or information-security management system, the organisation documents the procedures that cover the AI lifecycle: how regulatory requirements are identified, how systems are designed, built, tested and released, how data and documentation are managed, how post-market monitoring and incidents are run, how suppliers are controlled and how corrective action is tracked. Roles and resources are assigned, internal audits check that procedures are followed, and management reviews the system's performance at least annually. Records of the system itself are retained for the period authorities expect.

Which legal duties does it serve?

Satisfies means the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports means it contributes but the duty needs more. The official text decides; open it before relying on either.

European Union 3 duties

satisfies Legal requirement confidence high
Operate a quality management system
EU AI Act · Article 17 · applies from 2 Aug 2026

A documented management system covering the required elements.
supports Legal requirement
Complete conformity assessment, CE marking and EU database registration
EU AI Act · Articles 43, 47, 48 and 49; Annex VIII · applies from 2 Aug 2026

Internal-control assessment relies on the documented management system.
supports Legal requirement confidence high
Providers must meet the full set of provider duties for high-risk AI
EU AI Act · Article 16 · applies from 2 Aug 2026

The QMS is where most Article 16 duties are operated.

What evidence shows it is operating?

Evidence this control produces
Evidence	Type	What it shows
AI quality management system manual	Policy document	Scope, procedures, roles and records that make up the management system.
Internal audit of the AI management system	Audit or assurance report
Management review minutes	Governance meeting record

Owner: Quality lead. Frequency: annual.

Which risks does it address?

Subdomains of the MIT AI Risk Repository, with the incidents the AI Incident Database has recorded under each. Counts are live; they say how often a risk has materialised, not how well this control prevents it.

6.5 Governance failure Socioeconomic & Environmental3 incidents · 61 risk entries
7.3 Lack of capability or robustness AI system safety, failures, & limitations305 incidents · 126 risk entries

Which standards clauses does it correspond to?

Clause numbers only. A reference means the standard asks for overlapping work, so evidence may be reusable; it never means the standard discharges a legal duty.

Framework references
Framework	Reference	Note	Confidence
ISO/IEC 42001	Clause 4 to 10	The management-system structure as a whole; certification is optional.	high
NIST AI RMF	GOVERN 1.4, 1.5, 1.7		medium

Cite this record

AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Quality management system for AI development and supply”. https://aipolicytracker.org/controls/ai-quality-management-system (accessed 24 September 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.

Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.

Governance card

Kind: Policy
Owner: Quality lead
Frequency: Annual
Binding duties: 3 of 3
Review status: Pending human review

Confirm which of the duties above reach you (applicability check).
Assign the owner and the frequency.
Operate the control and keep the evidence listed.
Re-check when a duty changes (change log).

Related controls

Report a correction How we verify

Run this control as a tracked task with Certifyi, a separate compliance execution platform. AIPolicyTracker itself stays open and independent.

Frequently asked questions

Which legal duties does "Quality management system for AI development and supply" satisfy?: It is recorded as satisfying 1 and supporting 2 duties across European Union. A mapping means the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for; the official text decides whether it is enough.
What evidence shows this control is operating?: AI quality management system manual, Internal audit of the AI management system and Management review minutes. Owner: Quality lead. Frequency: annual.