AIPolicyTracker

Governance and accountability: AI obligations

Practical requirements extracted from policy instruments, with the source article, the actors they bind, evidence examples and original framework mappings. Legal requirements are marked; everything else is voluntary guidance.

2 results

Results

Legal requirement governance accountability South Korea

Foreign AI business operators above the threshold must designate a domestic representative in Korea

Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust · Article 36

An AI business operator without an address or place of business in Korea, whose user numbers or revenue meet the thresholds set by Presidential Decree, must designate in writing a domestic representative with an address in Korea. The representative handles the operator's duties under the Act, including submitting the Article 32 safety results, supporting high-impact AI confirmation and cooperating with fact-finding investigations, and the operator is treated as responsible for the representative's acts.

Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice) Applies from 22 Jan 2026
Legal requirement governance accountability South Korea

Operators of high-impact AI must prepare user-protection measures and keep records of their safety and trust measures

Framework Act on the Development of Artificial Intelligence and Establishment of a Foundation for Trust · Article 34(1)

Operators of high-impact AI must prepare and implement a plan to protect users, and must prepare and keep documents describing the measures they take to secure the AI's safety and reliability, so that they can be shown to the Ministry of Science and ICT on request. Further items may be added by Presidential Decree, and the ministry may publish guidelines on how to meet these duties.

Verified against the official source 26 Sep 2026 (a factual check against the official source, not a legal review or legal advice) Applies from 22 Jan 2026
Search

Frequently asked questions

What is an obligation on this site?
A single practical requirement pulled out of an instrument and stated on its own: keep a risk management system, log incidents, document training data, provide human oversight, and so on. Each one cites the article or section it comes from so you can check it against the source.
Does a voluntary obligation have legal force?
No, and every obligation is labelled either a legal requirement or voluntary guidance. Voluntary items still matter in practice, because procurement questionnaires and auditors ask about them, but only the binding ones carry legal consequence.
How do I find the obligations that apply to my organisation?
Filter by jurisdiction, category, actor, sector or use case. The applicability check asks a short set of questions and returns the duties that may reach you. It is an educational screen, not a legal determination, and it says so.
Why do some instruments have no obligations listed?
Because nobody has broken them out yet. Most instruments are recorded at summary level first; obligations are added jurisdiction by jurisdiction. The coverage and open-gaps pages publish exactly what is missing rather than hiding it.