AIPolicyTracker
Menu

AI policy explorer

Search and filter source-backed AI laws, regulations, standards, guidance and consultations. Each record shows its status, key dates, verification state and official source.

risk: systemic_risk ×

5 results

New York (United States) Act / statute Adopted Binding

New York RAISE Act (frontier model safety)

New York Responsible AI Safety and Education (RAISE) Act (S.6953-B / A.6453-B, signed December 2025)

The RAISE Act requires large developers of frontier AI models (defined by training compute and revenue thresholds) to publish and follow a safety and security protocol, report critical safety incidents to the state within a set period, not deploy models that create unreasonable risk of critical harm, and submit to Attorney General enforcement with civil penalties; the chapter amendments create a state oversight office and align definitions with California's Transparency in Frontier AI Act.

Applies from 1 Jan 2027 Source-linked · checked 11 Sep 2026 Official source
California (United States) Act / statute In force Binding

California SB 53

California SB 53: Transparency in Frontier Artificial Intelligence Act

SB 53 requires "large frontier developers" (developers of the most compute-intensive models above statutory thresholds) to publish a frontier AI framework describing how they assess and mitigate catastrophic risks, publish transparency reports when deploying new frontier models, report critical safety incidents to the California Office of Emergency Services, and protect employees who report safety concerns. It also directs creation of a public computing cluster ("CalCompute").

Applies from 1 Jan 2026 Source-linked Official source
International organisations (OECD, UNESCO, UN, G7, ISO) Code of practice Voluntary standard

G7 Hiroshima AI Process code of conduct

Hiroshima Process International Code of Conduct for Organizations Developing Advanced AI Systems (G7, 30 October 2023)

Eleven voluntary actions for organisations developing the most advanced AI systems, including foundation and generative models: risk identification and mitigation across the lifecycle, post-deployment vulnerability and incident monitoring, public transparency reports, responsible information sharing, security controls, content authentication such as watermarking, research on societal risks, priority to global challenges, technical standards, and data-input and personal-data safeguards. It sits alongside the Hiroshima Process guiding principles and, from 2025, an OECD-run voluntary reporting framework.

Adopted 30 Oct 2023 Source-linked · checked 11 Sep 2026 Official source
International organisations (OECD, UNESCO, UN, G7, ISO) Policy Adopted

Bletchley Declaration (AI Safety Summit 2023)

The Bletchley Declaration by countries attending the AI Safety Summit, 1–2 November 2023

Signed by countries including the United States, China, the EU, India, Japan and Brazil, the declaration recognises the opportunities of AI and the risks of frontier models, commits signatories to cooperate on identifying AI safety risks and building risk-based policies, and launched the summit series continued in Seoul (2024) and Paris (2025) and the network of AI safety institutes.

Adopted 1 Nov 2023 Source-linked · checked 11 Sep 2026 Official source
European Union Regulation Partially applicable Binding

EU AI Act

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act

The EU AI Act is a binding regulation that sets rules for developing, placing on the market and using AI systems in the European Union. It bans a small set of practices considered unacceptable, imposes detailed requirements on "high-risk" AI systems used in areas such as employment, education, credit, essential services, law enforcement and safety-critical products, requires transparency for chatbots and synthetic content, and creates separate duties for providers of general-purpose AI models. Obligations apply in phases between 2025 and 2027.

Applies from 2 Aug 2026 Source-linked Official source
Search