Artificial Intelligence Policy Tracker

MIT AI Risk Repository

Browse AI risks

18 risk entries extracted from 74 frameworks, coded by domain, subdomain, causal entity, intent and timing. Filter, then export the current selection with its licence and citation attached.

Export CSVExport JSON
Reset Also filtered by framework Critch2023 ×

18 entries

  1. One or more criminal entities could create AI to intentionally inflict harms, such as for terrorism or combating law enforcement.

    From TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  2. AI deployed by states in war, civil war, or law enforcement can easily yield societal-scale harm

    From TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  3. As a side effect of a primary goal like profit or influence, AI creators can willfully allow it to cause widespread societal harms like pollution, resource depletion, mental illness, misinformation, or injustice.

    From TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  4. Societal-scale harm can arise from AI built by a diffuse collection of creators, where no one is uniquely accountable for the technology's creation or use, as in a classic "tragedy of the commons".

    From TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  5. Harm can result from AI that was not expected to have a large impact at all, such as a lab leak, a surprisingly addictive open-source product, or an unexpected repurposing of a research prototype.

    From TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  6. AI intended to have a large societal impact can turn out harmful by mistake, such as a popular product that creates problems and partially solves them only for its users.

    From TASRA: a Taxonomy and Analysis of Societal-Scale Risks from AI (Critch2023)

  7. 01.02.00.a · Additional evidence

    Type 2: Bigger than expected

  8. 01.03.00.a · Additional evidence

    Type 3: Worse than expected

  9. 01.03.00.b · Additional evidence

    Type 3: Worse than expected

  10. 01.03.00.c · Additional evidence

    Type 3: Worse than expected

  11. 01.03.00.d · Additional evidence

    Type 3: Worse than expected

  12. 01.03.00.e · Additional evidence

    Type 3: Worse than expected

  13. 01.03.00.f · Additional evidence

    Type 3: Worse than expected

  14. 01.04.00.a · Additional evidence

    Type 4: Willful indifference

  15. 01.04.00.b · Additional evidence

    Type 4: Willful indifference

Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Where do these risk entries come from?

The MIT AI Risk Repository, which extracts risks from dozens of published frameworks, taxonomies and papers and codes each one by domain and subdomain, and by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing. This is a browseable copy, attributed and openly licensed, not original research.

What do entity, intent and timing mean?

They are the causal coding. Entity is whether a human or the AI system is the cause; intent is whether the harm was intentional or not; timing is whether it arises before or after deployment. Together they let you separate misuse from malfunction.

Can I export the results?

Yes, any filtered set exports as CSV or JSON, and every export carries the upstream source, licence and citation with it, because attribution is a condition of the licence rather than a courtesy.

What is the MIT AI Risk Repository?

A living database of AI risks extracted from published frameworks, taxonomies and papers, classified by a causal taxonomy of entity, intent and timing and by a domain taxonomy of seven domains and 24 subdomains. It is published by the MIT AI Risk Initiative under CC BY 4.0.