Colorado (United States) AI rules mapped to ISO/IEC 42001
Each row is one legal duty recorded for Colorado (United States) and the clause of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 it corresponds to. Use it to find which duties your existing evidence already reaches.
Coverage of this crosswalk
8 of 10 recorded Colorado (United States) duties carry a mapping
The denominator is the number of duties this platform has broken out for Colorado (United States), not the number of duties the law contains. Unmapped duties are ones no reviewer has crosswalked yet, not ones the standard fails to address.
The mapping
| Legal duty | Binding? | ISO/IEC 42001 clause | Why they correspond | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deployers must implement a risk management policy and programme Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1703(2) | Legal requirement | Whole management system (named in the statute) | The statute names ISO/IEC 42001 as a recognised framework. | high |
| Deployers must complete impact assessments for high-risk AI Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1703(3) | Legal requirement | Clause 6.1.4 AI system impact assessment | Original editorial mapping. | high |
| Developers must use reasonable care to avoid algorithmic discrimination Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1702(1) | Legal requirement | Clause 6.1.2, 6.1.3 | AI risk assessment and treatment. | medium |
| Developers must notify the Attorney General and deployers of discovered algorithmic discrimination Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1702(5) | Legal requirement | Clause 10.2; Annex A.8.4 | Corrective action and incident communication. | medium |
| Deployers must use reasonable care to avoid algorithmic discrimination Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1703(1) | Legal requirement | Clause 6.1.2; Annex A.9.2 | Risk assessment and responsible-use processes. | medium |
| Deployers must publish a statement about the high-risk AI systems they use Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1703(5) | Legal requirement | Annex A.8.5 | Information for interested parties. | medium |
| Deployers must notify the Attorney General of discovered algorithmic discrimination Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1703(7) | Legal requirement | Annex A.8.4 | Communication of incidents. | medium |
| Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1704 | Legal requirement | Annex A.8.5 | Information for interested parties. | medium |
What a mapping means
The duty and the clause ask for overlapping work, so evidence produced for one is likely to be reusable for the other. Confidence records how direct that overlap is.
What it does not mean
ISO/IEC 42001 certification does not discharge a legal duty and carries no force in Colorado (United States). A mapped row still has to be complied with on the statute's own terms.
Instruments in this crosswalk
- Colorado AI Act — Colorado (United States)
Informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult qualified counsel before acting.
Frequently asked questions
- Does ISO/IEC 42001 certification satisfy Colorado (United States) AI rules?
- No. ISO/IEC 42001 is a certifiable management system standard and carries no legal force in Colorado (United States). This crosswalk records that 8 of the 10 duties tracked here have a corresponding clause, which means the evidence may be reusable, not that the duty is discharged.
- How many Colorado (United States) AI duties map to ISO/IEC 42001?
- 8 of 10 duties recorded for Colorado (United States) carry a mapping to ISO/IEC 42001:2023.