Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system
Download: JSON · MarkdownUnder Colorado AI Act, C.R.S. 6-1-1704
What this label means
- Verified
- — a named reviewer opened the official source and confirmed the record; the date and the reviewer are shown.
- Pending review
- — linked to the official source and in the queue for a reviewer to confirm.
- Source-linked
- — linked to the official source, not yet confirmed by a reviewer.
On this page 9 sections
In brief
Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system is a legal requirement under the Colorado AI Act in Colorado (United States) (C.R.S. 6-1-1704). The record carries 1 evidence example and mappings to 2 frameworks.
- Instrument
- Colorado AI Act
- Jurisdiction
- Colorado (United States)
- Nature
- Legal requirement
- Source reference
- C.R.S. 6-1-1704
- Who it binds
- Provider / developer, Deployer / user organisation
- Evidence examples
- 1
- Framework mappings
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0, ISO/IEC 42001:2023
- Controls that meet it
- 1
- Official source
- Open official text
- Verification
- Pending review · source-linked
What does it require?
Any developer or deployer that makes an AI system available to consumers that is intended to interact with them must disclose to each consumer that they are interacting with an AI system, unless that would be obvious to a reasonable person. This duty is not limited to high-risk systems and covers chatbots and voice agents offered to Colorado consumers.
Practical action
Add an AI disclosure at the start of chatbot, voice and messaging interactions and record where it appears.
Who does it apply to?
Developers and deployers of any consumer-facing AI system intended to interact with consumers, whatever its risk level.
Which controls meet this duty?
Satisfies: the control, operated properly, does the work the duty asks for. Supports: it contributes but the duty needs more. Each control page lists every other duty it serves, so work done once can be counted once.
-
satisfiesProcessProduct owner · at launch and on material changeAI interaction and use disclosure notices
Serves 18 recorded duties · evidence: AI interaction or use notice, Notice catalogue, Notice wording approval
Point-of-interaction notice.
Templates that cover this duty
Generated from the records. Free · no account · links emailed to your work address. This duty is cited in each file with its source reference and a link back here.
- AI Agent Registry and Permission Matrix
Register · XLSX and DOCX · v6
- EU AI Act Article 50 Transparency Kit
Kit · DOCX and XLSX · v44
- ISO/IEC 42001 Gap Assessment and Statement of Applicability
Assessment · XLSX · v3
- NIST AI RMF ↔ EU AI Act ↔ ISO/IEC 42001 Crosswalk
Crosswalk · XLSX · v5
What evidence would a reviewer expect?
| Evidence | Type | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| AI interaction disclosure copy and screenshots | document |
Framework mappings
Original editorial crosswalks. They cite clause numbers only and reproduce no standard text; confidence reflects how direct the mapping is.
See every Colorado (United States) duty mapped this way →
| Framework | Reference | Note | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIST AI RMF 1.0 | GOVERN 5.1, MANAGE 4.1 | Transparency to end users. | medium |
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | Annex A.8.5 | Information for interested parties. | medium |
Frequently asked questions
Is this a legal requirement?
Yes. It is a legal requirement under Colorado AI Act (C.R.S. 6-1-1704).
Who must comply with this obligation?
Developers and deployers of any consumer-facing AI system intended to interact with consumers, whatever its risk level.
What evidence shows compliance?
A reviewer would expect: AI interaction disclosure copy and screenshots.
Which frameworks map to this obligation?
It is mapped to NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 GOVERN 5.1, MANAGE 4.1, ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Annex A.8.5. These are editorial crosswalks with a stated confidence, not official mappings.
Which controls satisfy this obligation?
AI interaction and use disclosure notices.
What should an organisation do in practice?
Add an AI disclosure at the start of chatbot, voice and messaging interactions and record where it appears.
Cite this record
AIPolicyTracker (2026). “Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system (Colorado AI Act)” [AIPT-OBL-0093, not yet verified]. https://aipolicytracker.org/id/AIPT-OBL-0093 (accessed 8 November 2026). Data licensed CC BY 4.0.
Permanent id AIPT-OBL-0093: it never changes or gets reused, and its address keeps working if this page moves.
Cite the official text alongside it: SB24-205 Consumer Protections for Artificial Intelligence, Colorado General Assembly, https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb24-205.
BibTeX
@misc{aipolicytracker2026_deployersanddevelopersmu,
author = {{AIPolicyTracker}},
title = {{Deployers and developers must disclose to consumers that they are interacting with an AI system (Colorado AI Act)}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-ai-act-consumer-ai-interaction-disclosure}},
url = {https://aipolicytracker.org/obligations/us-colorado-ai-act-consumer-ai-interaction-disclosure},
urldate = {2026-11-08},
note = {Data licensed CC BY 4.0. Accessed 8 November 2026}
}
Change history
No change to this record's tracked fields has been recorded since 15 October 2026, when field-level history began.
Similar obligations in other instruments
- Employers must inform workers and their representatives before using high-risk AI at work — EU AI Act, European Union
- Disclose AI interaction and label synthetic content — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must tell natural persons that a high-risk AI system is used in decisions about them — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers of emotion recognition or biometric categorisation must inform exposed persons — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must disclose deepfakes and AI-generated text published on matters of public interest — EU AI Act, European Union
- Providers of generative AI must mark synthetic output as artificially generated in a machine-readable way — EU AI Act, European Union
- Deployers must explain individual decisions taken with high-risk AI on request — EU AI Act, European Union
- Frontier developers must publish a transparency report before deploying a new frontier model — California SB 53, California (United States)
Disclaimer: informational only, not legal advice. Verify every claim against the linked official sources and consult a qualified lawyer before acting.